It was common to arrive for a call of "general illness" only to find the patient in respiratory failure or cardiac arrest with no CPR in progress.
I see this as providing a fast way for clueless staff to up-triage patients.
It was common to arrive for a call of "general illness" only to find the patient in respiratory failure or cardiac arrest with no CPR in progress.
I see this as providing a fast way for clueless staff to up-triage patients.
For regular people, this service is like a family doctor visit on Skype. Sometimes it can be handy, but it remains to be seen how this impacts outcomes statistically. (I wouldn't use this myself.)
For healthcare facilities, like nursing homes, this is like providing a doctor on call via telemedicine. Many hospitals already do this with radiologists or neurologists for example.
What is misleading is their marketing jump from these potentially useful scenarios to advertising as an alternative to 911 for the general public, and even claiming that they are faster than 911 when in fact they are a gatekeeper to 911.
My pet hate is always "Do you have a history on the patient or what's been going on?" was almost invariably answered with:
a) "No, this is my first day", or
b) "No, I just got on shift"
Oh. Good.