It's a pointlessly baity answer and deserves downvoting.
Respectfully disagree. He ridicules the simplistic solutions proposed to certain issues (lack of women in a math competition in this case). In my opinion, it adds a valid (and funny) point - you may agree or disagree with him, but it is not a reason to downvote. Sarcastic - yes, ad hominem - no.
I skimmed over it without reading the "Poe's law" line at the end. I've deleted my comment. Have to be more careful.
I think that line is new. I saw it earlier this morning and seriously debated whether or not it was serious.