The Los Alamos Primer: The Introductory Course for Scientists at Los Alamos
permalink.lanl.gov
permalink.lanl.gov
For the fusion bomb side, recently a book has been written http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/9269 There was some recent controversy regarding what material should be published, the author published it anyway http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/science/hydrogen-bomb-phys...
Anyone know why U-235 is called 25 (section 4), or why the atomic mass is slightly off? (233.66 amu)
Same with plutonium-239 which has 94 protons and 239 protons + neutrons. It was referred to as 4+9 = 49
An analogy I've heard is that without a tamper an implosion device would be analagous to resting a hammer on a nail and trying to push down on it. Including a tamper is analogous to raising the hammer and striking the nail. You accelerate the hammer head use the inertia of the hammer head to create a greater impulse to strike the nail.
EDIT: More clearly answering your question yes the spherical implosion mechanism was absolutely critical for creating the needed material density for the bomb. I'm correcting the usage of calling it a tamper, as it is a separate piece of the nuclear bomb puzzle.
"How to use the stairs" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDsTc2oWGSI
Nothing a little federal cash can't fix, though:
"The Los Alamos National Laboratory Slip Simulator Experience" http://www.efcog.org/wg/ism/events/Fall12mtg/presentations/L...