Edit: seems I'm getting downvoted for some reason. So here are some links: http://openeurope.org.uk/blog/reforming-greece-easier-said-d... http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/world/europe/former-greek-... http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results
Edit: seems I'm getting downvoted for some reason. So here are some links: http://openeurope.org.uk/blog/reforming-greece-easier-said-d... http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/05/world/europe/former-greek-... http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results
https://www.kfw.de/KfW-Group/About-KfW/Vorstand-und-Gremien/...
Because giving Greece more free money will not make the Greeks reform their country. Debt relief would just mean that they could borrow more money on the market and let the party continue.
Debt relief (even more than the huge amounts they've already received and squandered) is very much in the cards and has been all the time, if only they would reform.
Debt relief has been discussed, but has been blocked by the German government, even despite the German finance minister admitting the debt was unsustainable...
http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKL8N0ZP3P720150709?i...
"Europe's legal set-up therefore gives government leaders sufficient space to strike a debt restructuring of some kind for Greece if they want to. The issue is how far they go with any reprofiling as part of a potential deal with Greece.
German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said on Thursday the IMF was correct in saying Greece's debt was not sustainable without a haircut, but he added: "I think the leeway we have ... is very low.""
I was trying to point out the moral relativism at work in painting Greece as a hotbed of corruption, and Germany as paragon of financial virtue.
What I think is not helpful here are moral arguments over debt full stop. Nation states are neither moral nor people, and you can't 'teach them a lesson' which is the basis of much rhetoric around Greece at present.
That is /highly/ misleading.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KfW
"It is owned by the Federal Republic of Germany (80%) and the States of Germany (20%).[3] It is led by a six-member Managing Board headed by Ulrich Schröder, which in turn reports to a 37-member Supervisory Board. The chair of the Supervisory Board changes annually between the German Federal Ministers of Finance and Economic Affairs; the chairman for 2015 is Wolfgang Schäuble.[4]"
Other members of the supervisory board (from the list you linked to) are members of the German parliament, trade union leaders, other federal ministers, ministers from various German states, etc.
I disagree, I think it's highly improper that he even suggested money be given to an institution in which he has influence (currently Chairman of the Board), and which disburses money to German companies (Germany being one of Greece's creditors so not a neutral third party). Particularly given his history of fraud and corruption.
If money/assets are to be held in escrow, they should be held at a completely neutral third party.
Collateral must always be placed where those who lend the money can get at it if the borrower breaks the terms.
Germany was in no way alone in wanting collateral and the rest of the Northern EZ was fine with having Germany/Luxembourg in control of the "Treuhandfonds". But it could also have been placed in Hamburg or Helsinki and they would still have been okay with it.
(It was, as you might know, not to be placed directly under KfW but under the IfG in Luxembourg probably precisely so that it was not under Germany's /direct/ control.)
It should in no way whatsoever have been placed in Athens under Greek management, though!
Can we at least agree on that?