Understanding Obamacare
harpers.org
harpers.org
If you have never worked with the puzzle that is hospital billing and regulation, you really have no idea at how helpful many of the clauses in Obama's bill will be at lowering health costs in the U.S. Because of the tight regulation, high barriers to entry and mandate to provide the most expensive services for free to those who cannot afford it standard economic thinking does NOT fit when looking at healthcare.
No one, I believe, thinks for a minute that anyone in congress is an angel, or is working from truly altruistic motives. So let's stop basing our criticisms and writing our news as if anyone still does and let's start looking at facts based on BOTH economics AND the moral and ethical obligations of this country and our health system. If we are to live up to the hype of "the greatest nation" then we must...MUST provide health coverage to ALL americans especially the youth of this nation.
I think that was precisely the point. The actual political struggle has little to do with healthcare, that only defines the shape of the playing field.
If you have never worked with the puzzle that is hospital billing and regulation, you really have no idea at how helpful many of the clauses in Obama's bill will be at lowering health costs in the U.S.
I have a bit of knowledge of this. My wife works for a good-sized hospital managing the department that's responsible for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, and we've discussed this at great length. The very fact that this reimbursement requires a whole department ought to demonstrate that Medicare/caid is not a model of efficiency and low overhead as is claimed, but simply that they push their inefficiencies onto the providers.
But I'm quite surprised by your claim that the bill will lower costs. I don't see how that can be, nor can my wife or any of the industry people she talks with.
It's unclear how more regulation solves the problem of too much regulation....
> we must...MUST provide health coverage to ALL americans especially the youth of this nation.
CAPS are always a reliable indicator of a sound argument.
The "youth" actually has health coverage. As a "not youth", I'm happy to see that said youths are going to be forced to subsidize the "not youths" even more than they are today.
The best part of the whole thing is that said youths are pushing this.
Yay boomers! We got subsidized our entire lives.
And yet no innovating entrepreneurs have emerged to compete with these profitable enterprises.
Insurance is an information business, and as technology makes information-management cheaper, technological barriers to entry will fall, and competition will increase.
Any ideas for a startup?
This is an attractive sentiment, but, unfortunately, false.
I used to work for a private health insurer a couple of decades ago, and they absolutely do provide "real value", in two different forms. 1) They offer an opportunity to share risk among subscribers. If every small business (or individual) were responsible directly for their own health care costs, a catastrophic illness in the pool would most likely cause bankruptcy. By spreading the expenses (in the form of premiums) across a large pool of people (both healthy and sick), costs are levelled to everyone's advantage.
2) Even for groups with large enough risk pools to manage their own risk (i.e., companies of over 500 employees, generally speaking), health insurers provide a useful services in terms of negotiating discounts with hospitals, and in the formulation (and execution) of rules (such as which services are covered, what the co-payments should be, etc.). Large businesses often would self-insure (i.e., manage their own risk) but pay us a service fee to administer their plan.
The fact that health insurance in the US is tied to place of employment is a weird historical artifact, but the value the insurers provide woudl be the same if it were not the case. You may not pool your car insurance with your co-workers, but you are pooling it with somebody-- in this case, the other people who purchase insurance from the same auto insurance company as you.
That said, it is not going down that way and that is not even being discussed. Dem leaders wussed out, any PO is a start though