The Mob's IT Department
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
I refused the job in the politest way possible and got on with my life and I cut that whole branch of the family tree out of my life.
When I was a kid he'd always show off how much money he had, in the end it cost him the life of his son (killed by another mobster) and his family. I hope the money was worth it to him but I doubt it.
edit: so, I just received a message via email about my 'callousness' with this comment, let me clarify: if you push your wife, son, daughter into crime, get your son killed and attempt to recruit other family members into your crime empire then the world is (much) better off without you.
If anyone is stupid enough to get involved with such crimes as their selfish money-making empire, I will disrespect them and their choices for good reason. Leave kids out of it, or disrespect should be the mildest form of punishment to be endured, socially or formally. Try to bargain or reason with someone you care about making bad decisions, I'm all about trying to help friend or family, right up until they gamble with someone else's life.
You made the right call.
A few years ago I dropped a dime to the FBI to request they tap my phone. This led to my iPhone's return less than five minutes after it was stolen.
"Don't lose your iPhone," said the officer, "that's how we're keeping track of you."
I once threatened to murder a Vancouver PD officer when he refused to take my report when I wanted to report a drug informant hit. Hilarity ensued.
For unrelated reasons I am concerned that my days are numbered so tomorrow afternoon Im going to drop by the FBI field station here so I can sing like a bird.
I dont really know but speculate that my uncle died because he decided not to run for office rather than move legislation for Boswell Cotton Corporation. My father's older brother was VP of accounting.
One day my father came home, and his wife at the time mentioned that a delivery many had just come by and dropped off an age-appropriate gift for their son (my oldest brother) the day before his birthday.
My father had never mentioned where he lived, that he had a family or a son, his son's age, or birthday.
He never went back to that bar again.
One time my Aunt visited him and her daughter in Boston, a good 150 miles away for a week or so. On the last night her car was broken into, driver side window smashed and the stereo was stolen. The son-in-law said he would take care of it if they would stay for another couple of days. My Aunt had had enough of the city and didn't want to stay at all so they went back home as planned.
That night, back home, 150 miles away, the car was "broken into" again. This time, the driver window was replaced and a new stereo was installed.
Over the next couple of weeks a total of 8 car stereos randomly appeared overnight in the driveway, on the front steps or in the mailbox.
Eventually I got a picture of the business where they were defrauding their investors by winning their own games or through exploiting purposeful holes in the system. Eventually I just delivered them a functioning and secure system. Refused to go down to the Dominican to install it (Since they had considerable pull down there) and walked away. It was really the first large project I had done and walking away hurt me considerably. But it was the right thing to do.
Those guys are in jail now and the investors pulled the plug. So at least I have some vague sense of Schadenfreude over the whole thing.
Unfortunately ethical software developer isn't exactly a winning eye popping line item on the resume.
Fascinating article though, and the story would make a good movie.
I've noticed that a lot of IT workers tend to be non-confrontational and unwilling to stand up for themselves even if the situation calls for it. I find it interesting that Van De Moere and Maertens show the same tendency here. A reasonable person would go to the police to report an assault. These two men were likely selected because Adibelli sensed that they could be manipulated.
Plus, you have to only consider the repercussions of being confrontational in certain situations.
It is not, it won't
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Asian_Shepherd_Dog
I have seen these guys in action.
I was thinking more along these lines.
A livestock guard dog that can't hold its own against a wolf would be a very bad guard dog.
> An athletic dog, the Komondor is fast and powerful and will leap at a predator to drive it off or knock it down. It can be used successfully to guard sheep against wolves or bears.
I dunno. Further googling:
> Bred to drive away predators, not hunt them, the powerful Komondor will try to kill any animal that foolishly chooses to fight back.
http://www.dogchannel.com/dog-breeds/dog-breed-profiles/inac...
I dunno. It seems they kill coyotes not too infrequently, but it doesn't seem like wolves usually stick around long enough to kill or be killed by a Komondor, indeed. Wolves don't generally choose to fight animals that can fight back, which I guess is the message of the original aphorism. But if the wolf stayed to fight, the Komondor would fight it to the death one way or another, and their ridiculous looking coat is apparently actually pretty good defense against predator's teeth, and they've got very powerful jaws. At any rate, it's clear the Komondor is a fearsome fighter, despite looking like a stuffed animal to us, heh. And it doesn't protect the herd merely by sounding the alarm, but by being powerful enough to defend against wolves, for sure.
Wait, what's this thread about again?
... but Liam Neeson!
(for those that don't get it: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1601913 )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatolian_Shepherd
I know someone that has four of them. Conversations in the room with the dogs present tend to be very friendly ;)
One of them mentioned that there was 3 kinds of soldiers.
First was the one that would refuse to leave his foxhole once the shooting started.
Second was the kind that would storm the enemy at every chance.
Third would also storm, but only if it meant that his probable death could save the life of his fellow soldiers (and/or civilians).
His final remark was that the British army needed less of the first two and more of the third.
I haven't had problems though - those kinds of people sense I am with the lawful evil alignment.
You can put it down to being non-confrontational but what kind of non-confrontational nerd happily goes straight back into a room where they were previously assaulted?
EDIT: Also it's worth keeping in mind that this is just their version of the story, it might be 100% lies.
The article says that they cannot find a money trail to these guys.
:-)
"Standing up" to the mafia is not going to end well for most people.
That's so cliche. Ha. I can imagine that conversation "Our front is a fruit import/export legitimate business. We should hang up some posters of fruit. That will make it totally legit looking."
When we walked away, we waited until long after we were out of earshot and we all stopped and looked at each other and confirmed that we were all wondering the same thing. "Is that a mafia front?"
The phrase "[he] connected the battery to an antenna" breaks the flow of the story because it leads the reader to the wrong idea, then the reader has to backtrack...
An IRC channel with 100k users in 1996? Look, freenode has 85k users today, spread across 40k channels... Even worse, the Wikipedia page for securax indicates that it was an online community that had newsletter with 90k subscribers.
A long time ago, I worked in a computer store and I had a couple of customers whom I suspected were involved in organized crime. They were polite and personable but something about them made the hair on the back of my neck stand on end. I hated working with them. It was a great day when I found a new job and didn't have to deal with them again.
Or is it a bit of both?
If I had to take a wild guess, the author/editor of the article might've wanted some fancy stuff (like the header videos and scroll behavior, for instance) and it was easiest to do that on this platform.
Yup. We set up a system for publishing git repos with static html/css/js to /graphics for our interactive charts.
When the features desk for the new site started up a few months ago it was much easier for them to piggyback on our stack.
Many journalism organizations (including bloomberg and NYT) have kept the nomenclature for their special feature and 'interactives' groups who do pieces like this in non-traditional layouts with custom art and interactivity.
A fascinating read, thanks for sharing.
I recently read the "Mocro Mafia"; a Dutch non-fiction book about the 'war' that's still going on in Amsterdam (and Antwerpen too) between two groups of criminals dealing with drugs-import. It's all based on facts (and of course a lot of hearsay) and police-reports, but it reads like a script for a Hollywood-movie. I don't know about an English version, but don't be surprised if it turns up next to the "Heineken Kidnapping"-book.
I dunno. This sounds more plausible than the Silk Road conspiracy theories.
The ITU's Child Online Protection initiative notifies Google of child pornography links. Google prmptly removes them from its index.
I expect Microsoft is so notified as well but Satya Nadella doesnt remove the links nor cached images, despite the original servers having been dead for years.
I am convinced that kim dotcom's bust gad nothing to do with copyright but that much of the, uh, "digital media" was distributed from his servers; however most is encrypted, but typically with very obvious or easily brute forced passwords.
More or less you start with bing then pay for a premier account with a filesharing service.
There is also "link protection" mostly our of India, which hides the referring page. One can earn decent coin by promoting a popular ptotected link.
Most of those links are found on what should be dead forums but whose servers are still operating.
An easy way to rain on the mob's parade would be to scout around for threads that go on for hundreds of pages.
http://www.warplife.com/jonathan-swift/books/software-proble...
Secondly, if you're trying to state that the NSA specifically knew that these specific companies were open to these specific exploits, but chose not to do anything, then that's a stretch. Were the NSA doing it's job of helping to secure networks, it would only be attempting to secure domestic networks. I doubt very much they would drop an email to a foreign company stating that they found their network security to be lacking.
I could of course be wrong, but hey. Obviously you're right that the technical level of expertise is a little below this level in this case anyway, but I just wanted to emphasize that this is the sort of societal impact of having a policy of subverting network security.
If the Dutch logistics companies were running unpatched versions of Windows (for example) that seems more like an operations failure than anything else. Not necessarily something that is a broken part of the "stack."