OOP suffers from a distinct lack of clear, universally accepted, definition that allows such questions to be answered well, but certainly a key component of many understandings of OOP involves centrality of mutable state and particular ways of modifying it which is at least arguably "anti-parallel", and many popular forms of OOP (particularly static, class-based OO) is prone to encourage coupling which makes really independent modularity difficult to achieve, though OOP is based on a kind of modularity which is consistent with this kind of coupling.
So, on balance, maybe, kinda, depending on what kind of modularity and what kind of OOP you are talking about.