Of course getting rid of the pathogens is a great thing, but perhaps chlorination plays a role in causing some modern problems that are related to the immune system and the gut biome? Anyone have links to studies done on this topic?
Of course getting rid of the pathogens is a great thing, but perhaps chlorination plays a role in causing some modern problems that are related to the immune system and the gut biome? Anyone have links to studies done on this topic?
Velasquez-Manoff on Autoimmune Disease, Parasites, and Complexity: http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2014/03/velasquez-manof.htm...
A study comparing gut bacteria, immune markers etc of rural well water drinkers to city water drinkers might be a place to start.
EPA: "Approximately 15 percent of Americans rely on their own private drinking water"
If drank only collected rain water then it would be private. Except for the pollutants picked up from the air.
I do not believe my well shares water with their supply because they have much safer water than I do. We have many more heavy metals in ours, and more arsenic. They run off some basic water filters, and I have a much more complex water treatment system in my basement.
I'm not pointing this out just to argue - the point is that those of us on a well do maintain an awareness of where our water comes from and what is in it, probably much more so than those on public water supplies.
For the purposes of this discussion, unless one of your neighbors is pumping chlorine into the ground I think its fine. Also private vs public here refers to the ownership of the water infrastructure.
There's little sense in using a dualistic lens when it comes to solutions that have a cost. i.e. "At least Chlorine saves people". No. Chlorine is a solution that has drawbacks. If there are solutions that don't have the drawbacks that Chlorine has, then lets explore those solutions.