As an example I just put in Oct 11, 2015.
SF:
21 hotels $55-$110
36 hotels $110-$160
55 hotels $160-$220
123 hotels $220+
NYC: 4 hotels $55-$110
7 hotels $110-$160
35 hotels $160-$220
367 hotels $220+As an example I just put in Oct 11, 2015.
SF:
21 hotels $55-$110
36 hotels $110-$160
55 hotels $160-$220
123 hotels $220+
NYC: 4 hotels $55-$110
7 hotels $110-$160
35 hotels $160-$220
367 hotels $220+http://travelskills.com/2015/07/01/san-francisco-hotels-not-...
Using the Average Daily Rate instead, SF hotels come out as third most expensive in the US (behind NYC and Honolulu).
So the survey and results are pretty much meaningless.
22 hotels $75-$125
79 hotels $125-$199
88 hotels $200-$299
79 hotels $300+
5 star average of $382, 4 star average of $348 etc
The article really should be using median pricing anyway, but I don't see where they could get such a high average - the total average from Expedia is $246.
In most cases it's because local lodging taxes are insanely high. I regularly see e.g. $65 rooms bumped up to close to $100. (I haven't stayed in SF, but it would surprise me if it's an exception.)
Are European taxes set at a national level? In USA the relevant taxes are set by each city and county, so by hiding the tax, highly-taxed hotels can better compete with those in the next town over.
EDIT: don't expect anything to be good for the consumer!
Your answer doesn't make sense though. Laws around price display need to be consumer-centric, not provider-centric. Why should a place in a high-tax location be able to compete with a place in a low-tax location by fooling the customer?
For example, usually a bag of chips at Target or Walmart or a convenience store will say eg $3.99 printed on the bag. Some stores will slap their own dominant label on there, others choose not to.
Vendors often stock the shelves at stores, especially for certain categories of products, and store types. The chip delivery guy will stock the convenience store, Walmart, etc.
Chip production (eg Doritos) and delivery is limited to just a few factories, but they distribute to every state. For convenience, for decades, the companies have typically pre-stamped prices on chip bags.
So why not do it with hotels? Because no other segment of the economy tends to do it, and for the other reason mentioned: it cuts into price rounding advertising methods (or you have to raise prices to the next rounding).
If you want taxes built into the pricing on consumer goods, either they have to stop price labeling before delivery, or customize for every state. At this point, nobody really wants to change, because the system works fine as is. Ie it's good enough, but not perfect.
:)
I think your system sucks donkey ass. :)
The actual reason is a lack of sufficient pressure to change this practice.
This is a bit of a cheat, first because high lodging taxes are often created at the request of local hotel owners: it typically feeds a tourism-advertising slush fund. Also, we're now overrun by TIF, a scheme by which government loan guarantees for development are theoretically repaid by higher "taxes" on business in the developed area. In that case hotel guests are directly paying the bills for hotel investors.
My personal sense is that San Francisco has gotten more expensive than New York or London. It obviously depends on what's happening at the time and where you're staying but I find with a little searching I can usually dig up reasonable-ish rates in New York and London. In San Francisco, if there's a big Moscone event (which tends to be when I travel there), it's hard to find much even on the other side of town.
Both also have good public transport, which makes hotels further from the event more appealing. (I don't know SF enough to content on transport there).
In general, public transportation in San Francisco isn't very good although it's really not very good to get to the Javits in New York either. However, the Fisherman's Wharf area and Nob Hill aside aside I'm not sure there's a huge amount of hotel capacity in San Francisco outside of a 10-15 minute walk to the convention center anyway.
It's fairly common for both business and vacation travelers to stay in Oakland and commute.