Even though they've eliminated Super Size (since the movie) the large coke at McDonald's USA is still massively bigger than the large in Australia
More is more.
http://i.imgur.com/UJMBMEA.png
It is BuzzFeed though -- so who knows.
Tiny city-states are not known for being particularly recognizable unless you've been there.
This is also another pricing curiosity. Who buys a large when there are free refills? I guess I don't understand it, but I gave up drinking everything that is in a fountain many years ago. When I eat out I usually just don't drink anything except coffee or water.
Restaurant portions are much smaller in Australia (as you'd know), but generally people will eat the entire plate, and maybe an entrée (starter) too.
This doesn't really apply to fast food, though - since if you want less food you can just order a small. My girlfriend and I would order two burgers and share a small chips & drink in the US because the portions were so large.
True. It is completely accepted to take leftover food home from all but the highest of high class restaurants. A typical restaurant dish will make up something like 1-3 servings.
A variety of reasons might be at play, but I think the lack of social inhibition for taking food home is part of it. Most restaurants will ask if you'd like a box if there is food remaining at the end of your meal.
I think the most interesting global evil megacorp franchise country might be Japan. On one hand, the Americana brand is very strong, on the other hand there's no way US sizes would work in Japan.
In the end (if things haven't changed in ~13 years) McDonald's/Burger King end up being almost as raw a deal in Japan as in Norway. Of course in Japan, you get much better service. That's just the way Japan works.
Can you really get a beer with your burger in Amsterdam?
You can in Spain, although unfortunately it's only available if you choose to eat your meal inside the restaurant ;P
I talk McDonalds in Barcelona province. The only problem is that the beer is Cruzcampo :P
I think you can't in Italy
I'm writing this just to illustrate my point: why "but"?
You make it seem like your statement is contradicting mine, yet I fail to see the connection.
(Not that there's anything "wrong" about this - I just don't understand why.)