Lexus Builds a Functional Hoverboard Prototype
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
The whole concept is so stupid it hurts. The superconductors in the board needs to be extremely cold, and the ground needs to be covered in magnets. Or vice versa. The liquid nitrogen needed for this is cumbersome and will evaporate quickly.
As seen the last time someone tried making a hover board it is impossible to stand on it. It will slide with equal non- friction in every direction making it impossible to keep the balance. The only alternative is to keep it locked to a track, like a toy train.
I like the idea (my kids would love it). It certainly has marketing value and calls up dreams of an amazing future, but there do seem to be some real practical problems (as the parent alludes to). Stopping seems particularly exciting.
From what I gather, the board would apply a single linear resistance (vertical) aswell as resistance from every rotation axis. So theoretically, we enough skill, you could balance yourself on the board purely by using rotational resistance, even without the directional friction I just mentioned. You couldn't jerk your legs forward and backward, but you could push on the ball of your feet to shift backward, and push on your right foot to shift to your left.
Am I making sense?
Where'd you read that? All I read was that they are working on a friction-free car.
It uses super-conductivity to facilitate levitation. Flux pinning creates an 'on-rails' movement between the two components (the superconductor and the magnetics on the ground).
Defects in the magnets and gaps would create areas of resistance, much like they do in toy-scale versions of this same concept, but you'll still be pinned to the magnetics as long as that superconductor stays cold.
There will be no 'astronaut-in-space' movement, because the board will only be able to achieve quantum levitation over a bed of magnetics, which will be many pieces and not defect-free.
http://quantumlevitation.com/the-physics/
http://www.ted.com/talks/boaz_almog_levitates_a_superconduct...
As others have pointed out, it depends a bit on how much lateral force you can achieve through tilting and reaction forces, but if you can balance a quadcopter, you can balance a hoverboard. It gets a lot easier if your load is attached to the platform.
Edit: I realize now that superconductive magnetic locking might be different than this, but since you mentioned the need for magnets I guess I got confused. Sorry for the downvote.
source : http://www.engadget.com/2015/06/23/lexus-slide-hoverboard-ma...
This sounds like it uses the Meissner effect. If so, it will only work on special surfaces.
Compare with Hendo, which was also way over hyped and only mentioned this little detail in the fine print. Theirs works on a slightly different principle though.
Technical limitations? Gasp! Not practical? Such hacks! Even the movie board didn't work on water.
It's a marketing stunt. But it's also an homage to something inspirational.
What was the point of all this again?
What a giant cocktease video, geez ...