Reaction Housing’s temporary shelters

Seems impractical compared to something like the Ikea flat pack shelter.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/26/8287509/ikea-refugee-shelt...

The wrist band lock seems rather impractical the majority of circumstances that you'd encounter in the aftermath of a disaster or in refugee camps. And the advantage of no assembly seems to be a rather small advantage compared to the cost (a rather bulky construction). The amount of shelters you can put on a truck (http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52e6ca70e4b0aeaf06546d...) seems to be quite little.

I like the techy look and the idea seems cool, but it also seems to look like a very technocratic approach to shelters. This might work well for first world countries that have to deal with the fixing shelters after a disaster when conditions are quite good. But I can't see this helping out afters disasters like the one in Nepal.

In summary - how does this compare (technology and/or cost) to common container housing, as seen on building sites and refugee centers today?

Is not clear how the unit is powered. Does it have batteries, solar panels or do you have to plug it in?

Good luck getting trucks with this into Nepal. Tents or even wood for cabin can be air droped.

Roadmap: After 7 years exos capable for space launch? Did I hear that correctly?