Introducing the San Francisco system font
developer.apple.com
developer.apple.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_%281984_typeface...
http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=World_Class_Citie...
I often wonder if what appears to me to be a very clear cut in aesthetic standards between the 1980s and the 2010s is the result of my own bias (I was born in the late 1990s) or actually a thing. In fact, I do not find the difference between common fonts used in the 1960s -> 1990s as shocking.
What's your take on this? Do you think there has been a bigger and more drastic change in what people consider "aesthetically pleasant" between now and the 1980s compared to other time-periods.
On the other hand, the "fun" of fonts like San Francisco ('84) might have partially worn off as computers became more integrated into our lives.
Many currently popular web typefaces have been around for decades. Helvetica, Avenir, Franklin Gothic, Futura, etc.
Emigre was one of the early people to push design in that area. They still have a section on their "low res" fonts:
http://www.emigre.com/EFfeature.php?di=101
Through their fonts, and in Emigre magazine, the did spend a lot of time discussing what was aesthetically pleasing.
Then the LaserWriter took over, and postscript fonts became more of the norm.
gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/1/archive/userserve-ucsd-edu/Fonts/%20bitmapped%20fonts/screen-ImageWriter%20Fonts/Boston%20II
Hopefully that's what you're looking for :)
You have to remember that before the Mac arrived, if you wanted graphic design you had to pay someone. Or if you were ambitious, you'd maybe buy some stick-on letter decals and try to make them line up to make a headline or a logo. (It hardly ever looked good.)
Most people had no idea what fonts were, and if they were aware of graphic design at all it was because of vinyl album covers.
On computers, the previous generation of 8-bit micros couldn't handle fonts. So you had a choice between the system font, which usually looked ugly but might have some weird icons you could draw shapes with, and the kind of overwrought hand-drawn (pixeled?) lettering you'd find in many 8-bit games.
A lot of people underestimate how influential the Mac was. It turned graphic design into something everyone could work with - which is why you now have fast food joints with sandblasted Helvetica on their windows, and regular passing font fads, like Ray Larabie's Neuropol, which was everywhere ten years ago.
1990s/2000s web design was not a little crass, with Flash loading pages everywhere, lots of cyan and orange, fonts that said "Look at me! I'm a font!", and strange linear graphics with 45 degree kinks in them. Business sites were often messy and used a lot of Verdana and Tahoma - like Amazon's product pages, which haven't changed much in ten years.
The recent Bootstrap/etc fad has converged on a style that isn't distracting and works well when you want a clean but pleasing look. It's kind of homogenised, and not very creative, especially when it's paired with a hipster logo. But it does the job, and original creative graphic design is not easy.
Having lived through the 1990s and the early 2000s, I prefer the contemporary Bootstrap/Medium look by a long way.
https://books.google.nl/books?id=pD0EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT7&lpg=PT7...
In fact Bob Bishop's early "Apple Vision" demo used his own machine language HRCG with the same font as in text mode so it could draw text on the screen (which was an amazing feat at the time).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiWE-aO-cyU
The zero page COUT character output routine vector set so you could just PRINT characters and they would appear in hires. But when you ^C'ed the program it would print out "BREAK" and the basic prompt on the hires screen, then call the CIN character input routine, which went through DOS and was not revectored to the HRCG, so that DOS would reset the COUT vector to normal text mode output, so none of the subsequent text would go to the hires screen. It was maddenly frustrating that it could write any text onto the hires screen while the program was running, up until you broke the program, and then no more. Later general purpose HRCG's solved that problem and added more fonts, so you could use the computer with hires text in any font. It was slow (especially scrolling) but luxurious and worth it!
http://apple2history.org/spotlight/bobbishop/
I can't remember the name of the HRCG I used, but it might have been Beagle Brothers or something like that. They even had variable width text with FlexType!
http://beagle.applearchives.com/Posters/Poster%204.pdf
ftp://ftp.apple.asimov.net/pub/apple_II/images/graphics/flextype.txt
And then there was Mike Koss's "The Terminal" with its 3x5 font that could fit 32 lines by 70 characters on the screen! I fucking loved that program, and used it a lot, with my face pressed up against the screen.
http://mckoss.com/jscript/tinyalice.htm
http://www.donhopkins.com/home/pub/apple2/the.terminal.doc.t...
Also, if the parent hasn't seen it, Apple Watch's particular brand of animated emoji is rather unusual - I think it's somewhat garish, unusually for Apple, but it's certainly an attempt at... something. Drawing is certainly not a normal expectation for such a tiny screen; measuring heartbeats is one thing, but sharing them is another, and... yeah, I shouldn't bother responding to trollish comments.
[0] http://i.imgur.com/Q1tZknV.png
[1] https://www.flickr.com/photos/splorp/8289012748/in/photostre...
[2] http://web.archive.org/web/20030807223056/http://www.ms-stud...
I found fewer bitmap fonts than I had thought I had saved. I came across a specimen printout with Espy Sans and Espy Serif (also BeBox) so I had it at one point. But I only found a file for "Espi Sans" that I think was an imitation. I also have the TTF conversion Epsy Sans.
If you would like some help cracking Taliesin I spent most of high school reverse engineering resource forks. Some of what I learned must still be lodged in my brain somewhere.
And yes, the first thing I thought of when I saw this article title was the old funky letter font.
Speaking of Mark Simonson, I recently realized that he was the very same as the Mark Simonson behind Atari Classic fonts — http://members.bitstream.net/marksim/atarimac/fonts.html
Yeah, sure. For the time being, they will be here: http://cs.gettysburg.edu/~duncjo01/LostFonts/ As previously stated, I'm still missing a few though.
>Speaking of Mark Simonson, I recently realized that he was the very same as the Mark Simonson behind Atari Classic fonts — http://members.bitstream.net/marksim/atarimac/fonts.html
Oh wow, nice find! I never made that connection.
Also, how in the world do you actually get to that page from the root of the Apple Developer site? It's not linked from the Resources page [1] (its parent in its URL), and it's also not to be found on the UI design resources page [2]. I'm wondering because I saw this font download (the new version of San Fransisco, not the Watch variant, which has been up for a while) referenced a couple times earlier this week, but never could find it myself until just now when it was linked.
[1] https://developer.apple.com/resources/ [2] https://developer.apple.com/design/
Makes no sense.
And if it is to be a system font, it will be used for body text as well. Not too different from Myriad in that context anyway.
San Francisco is a UI type family for use in products. Just as Apple has never preferred Lucida Grande or Helvetica for marketing (only using either on the web in the pre-webfont era), this announcement doesn't get set in San Francisco. If Apple has a webfont version of it at all, the only place it would get used is on icloud.com, which is an actual web-based product UI.
All that said, this announcement could do with a bit more of the typeface on display than the paltry two letters seen here.
[1] http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mac-ad-1...
I would have appreciated a type sample or maybe some mostly-vapid sketches of a few letterforms, but I didn't really expect the entirety of the text itself to be set in the system font.
(I miss Chicago. I kind of want to see a hacked up OS X using Chicago or at least Charcoal as the system font....)
Turns out it's a subreddit! https://www.reddit.com/r/keming
An on-topic example of keming, from said subreddit: http://i.imgur.com/jOZ58Vm.png
Also, in searching for this, I just found a Google easter egg: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=kerning (look at the search result body text.)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/San_Fran...
I like it personally. But I much prefer Google's new version of Roboto:
https://camo.githubusercontent.com/3e191ddf621d46efd1fbfa919...
I understand a type foundry not making their product available for free, but software behemoths like apple, google and microsoft can and should help make quality fonts available for everyone.
It seems to be on the thinner side, and in turn off-putting.
The lowercase letter strokes seem to end in non-right-angles a lot, which bothers me a bit.
Bonus picture of font rendering: https://d.maxfile.ro/amaflffqtz.png
Most importantly, the restrictions on the fonts:
Standard font: A. Limited License. Subject to the terms of this License, you may use the Apple Font solely for designing or developing applications for Apple-branded products running on Apple’s iOS or OS X operating systems, as applicable.
Compact font: A. Limited License. Subject to the terms of this License, you may use the Apple Font solely for purposes of design and development of applications for Apple Watch.
They also include additional clauses requiring Developer Program membership and Apple-branded hardware.
I was concerned based on what I'd seen of the typography of the Apple Watch that it'd be too cold and characterless (I really dislike Roboto on Android) to use across OS X and iOS, but by creating this separate UI variant they're able to make it feel like a gradual transition from Helvetica Neue. It's so similar, in fact, that I'd not be surprised if we end up seeing more font quizzes asking: ‘Arial or Helvetica …or San Francisco?’
Is there an analog of this font for Android, anyone know?
Because, if there is a font that is similar enough to this, on Android, then I'll be happy to use San Francisco on iOS, and the alternative on Android. But, if there isn't, I will avoid this font and try to find one which is platform-friendly.
There is no way I'm keen on designing, at the Type level, exclusively for Apple platforms.
That's a play in this 'freebie' that is extraordinarily offensive.
It also seems to have more weight and being clearer from distance, but that may also be my monitor tricking me.
Helvetica = more elegant
San Francisco = more legible