Eric Schmidt's Home Page
ericschmidt.com
ericschmidt.com
* 2001: A big photo that looks like it was taken during a "Networld+Interop"/Novell presentation
* 2001: eschmidt@novell.com :)
* 2002: eschmidt@google.com
* 2005: ericschmidt1@yahoo.com
* 2014: twitter button
It hasn't changed much since 2001 :)
http://web.archive.org/web/20010422003224/http://ericschmidt...
EDIT: at least I prefer pages like this over say LinkedIn profile.
If you're talking solely about its looks and contents, then I won't argue. But if you look at the HTML behind it... it's pretty bad: the internet doesn't need more pages this poorly written. :P Try and validate it: https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fericschmidt....
Half as many errors as there are lines of HTML, and that's HTML 4 transitional.
Oh well, it doesn't matter too much, but I'm a web developer so I still have to care to a degree. ;)
This can be confirmed with internet archive. [1] vs [2]
[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20111220220928/http://ericschmidt...
[2] http://web.archive.org/web/20131030012224/http://ericschmidt...
As to another's comment on the speed... interestingly enough the image and twitter button don't actually load that fast... they pop in.... for what it is, having the images inline may be a better choice (for raw speed). As would simplifying the broken markup.