Media: A world of hits
economist.com
economist.com
We're talking about IP, where conventional understanding of supply-and-demand is turned on its ear because supply is effectively infinite.
But even considering that, isn't this suggestion backwards? If you've got a product that's in high demand, shouldn't that be what you charge more for?
Doing this would allow fixed costs for less-popular products to be amortized more quickly, and I think that would make their ROI less risky.
The blockbuster is very healthy it seems.