Says something about Ars' business model, that a hoary old site seems to sustain itself with some throwback non-native ads and subscriptions, while the Huffington Posts of tech journalism have to sustain growth beyond their audience and crisp initial point of view, into something mushy and barely palatable.
They might not be the flashiest, highest-profile tech news site, but maybe that is part of their advantage--less clickbait and more actual reporting.
Their coverage of modern password cracking was also top-notch and, with the "correct horse battery staple" XKCD, changed the way a lot of people think about strong passwords.
I would like to be very wrong.
[0]: http://arstechnica.com/cars/2014/07/a-day-in-the-new-porsche...
[1]: http://arstechnica.com/cars/2014/07/hands-on-with-audis-flag...
Alas, that was something of a perfect storm for The Verge, and these days most of their content that isn't aggregation seems to consist of fairly vapid, Gawker-esque "thinkpieces" and "hot takes" designed only to drive readers to the comment section.
http://www.polygon.com/2015/4/6/8285529/looking-glass-histor...
http://www.polygon.com/features/2015/5/21/8627231/the-first-...
The day-to-day Polygon "news" doesn't interest me much, but their "features" have been excellent.
I understand they need more traffic but if I want film reviews I'll go to a film website I don't understand why they think their game reviews are equipped to discuss things they don't know much about.
Yeah.