> Isomorphic JavaScript Framework
No. Just no.
No. Just no.
I'm not a fan of it either ("isomorphic" already has a different well-defined meaning in CS), but it does seem to have some traction now.
Perhaps you have an alternative term you'd prefer these frameworks used?
[1]: https://medium.com/the-thinkmill/making-the-case-for-progres...
Thanks for the link, good to know people are thinking about the naming issues.