This 3 hour work will relieve you from weeks, even months, of uncertainty/lurking, not to mention the possible anxiety due to not understanding people's conversations. By the end of the 3 or 4 hour studying, you actually learned something, and can decide confidently on your next moves.
For example, as a Vim user, I always wanted to learn Emacs, and god know how much time I have wasted in reading those fun editor war threads. Last month in one evening I finally installed it, finished the built-in tutorial in 2 hours. Then I installed Spacemacs which has been hot recently, I spent another 2 hours playing around, learning how to configure it. In 4 hours I gained a pretty solid idea about Emacs' setup, how to do common tasks, some useful packages, including the annoyingly frequently mentioned Org-mode (ok, it is indeed powerful, e.x., the calendar thing is pretty rad). Emacs is extensible for sure, but I know I don't have time to learn it now. I also know in the future I will start with default Emacs, not Spacemacs, if I renew my learning.
Anyway, I have this problem of waiting and lurking. IMO spending a few hours finishing one or two tutorials _today_ is a much better approach than weeks/months of evaluating through reading Reddit/HN posts. For example, even if you apply this method conservatively -- once every 15 days, you will accumulate _hands-on_ knowledge on more than 20 new technologies in a year.
I do feel annoyed by people who get caught up in the hype and say "we'll use react on our stack" when they don't even know what React is. I just point them to the facebook tutorial.
If you want something to do right this minute, just start working with Mint or You Need a Budget (depending on how automated you want things).
Expansion of vocabulary and etymology by reading "old" books and papers: changes the "resolution", precision and context of thought.
Filtering of "content" into timeless classics (of which there are several centuries of reading) and likely timeless future classics. Much can be ignored. Social network analysis can cluster related material for inclusion, exclusion and comparative analysis of bias.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/brettnelson/2012/06/04/do-you-re...
I recently left a position as a developer where I may have been considered irreplaceable by some. I had worked with some systems and websites for so long I became a fixture of this organization.
When opportunities and change were presented to me from higher-ups in my organization my direct supervisors took it upon themselves to do everything in their power to prevent it. It wasn't pretty, there was plenty of drama, guilt, and even some underhandedness. Needless to say I found a new position ASAP.
In my new position I'm replaceable. I believe that if I left today someone could take my place relatively easily. However, I'm much happier and it's refreshing to feel like I have mobility in my career again.
I had this problem that when knowing from others that things I have known are basically incorrect but wouldn't wholeheartedly accept it, given how factually their proof is. Whenever you need to correct yourself, analyze it and be ready to unlearn.
Always remember, there are dragons in earth and you haven't seen it. Yet.
Short, simple read that forever enables you to unspin the nonsense surrounding you.