The main problems seem to be:
1) The sites only work once you have enough users to make them work, but you can't get more users until the site works.
2) People use them for sex, which is off-putting to large numbers of users.
OKC should probably set up some kind of meet-friends-in-groups thing.
I've considered going to a computer / technology / entrepreneurship club, but haven't yet. They also have local groups for dog owners, walking/fitness/specialty (ballet, dance), FPV drone flyers, sports groups, and almost anything else I could think of they had a group already started for it in my city.
Some have memberships fees (completely optional when setting up a new group, afaik) and some have more strict requirements when joining (a potential problem but I haven't heard of it being abused).
This seems like something that would be in a David Letterman "Top 10 list of things to consider for your new website".
Althought it sounds a bit sparse at the moment.
I also didn't realize this site was already out there, but if it was dating/sex related by that time, I wouldn't have known it could be used for that.
FWIW, there's another site I think similary created for meeting people nearby as friends (Meetme.com) that has also turned into a sex/hookup app.
Her response rate was about 40%. I cried a little.
On the other hand, two guys or two girls going out on a date is not as big a deal. The perception is that it's safer. There is of course a lot to worry about, but the playing field is usually a lot more level. This of course is offset by the fact that on most dating sites your pool of gay or lesbian candidates is smaller, but your chances of them responding will generally be higher.
OkCupid, at least when I signed up 10+ years ago, allowed you to specify that you were interested in platonic activity partners, and would show both a match rating and friend rating.
The female he was talking to may or may not be real... But, if you wanted to get inside information on a bunch of companies, it would be a great way to do it (and i'm sure it's happening as we speak).
I guess it's the universe rewarding him for his good intentions.
Eventually we gave the adult content its own space on the site and charged for access to that portion and this was the financial cork that kept the whole thing afloat during many years.
See also:
http://jacquesmattheij.com/content/story-behind-wwcom-camara...
I've always resisted the pressure to either partner with a porn company or to let the inmates run the asylum but plenty of porn companies licensed the software and quite a few of those then pushed the envelope in terms of development often with lucrative deals as the result.
You wouldn't be the first to get support from a source you're conflicted with to do what you actually wish to accomplish. If you would decide to walk away, well, then you wouldn't be the first to do that as well.
This could work well for scheduled events as well as your weekend fishing example.
Does something like this already exist, anyone (I'm googling and not yet finding anything)?
Everybody knew what was happening but was looking away as long as the money was good, even MasterCard. Internally the code names we used for them was "online gaming" or "innovative business models". Whenever an executive used these words you knew he meant them. There are acquirers that specialize in merchants with high cb rates. But they go kicked even from there (after MasterCard intervened). I have no idea where they are now.