Bootstrapping vs. Venture Funding?
markpeterdavis.com
markpeterdavis.com
I thought lifestyle businesses were small craft or bespoke software development shops which allowed an individual to earn modest revenue while following their lifestyle of choice.
A few million dollars per year in revenue provides one awesome lifestyle!
If you were instead doing $100k a year in revenue at (say) a 20% margin, that would mean you take home $20k a year (assuming you revinvest nothing in the business), which would be more of a "hobby" than a "lifestyle".
Distilled: a lifestyle business is one that makes choices to optimize the lifestyle of its owners rather than the success of the business.
For that reason, "lifestyle business" owners are more likely to drive Porsches than startup owners.
So, no, "lifestyle company" definitely doesn't mean "poor".
Also, a business that generates a few million a year doesn't necessarily have 100% profit margins (in fact, I think it's safe to say that most don't).
The overwhelming majority of people who "go out for VC" will never get it, no matter how good their idea, no matter how good their technical execution. The people who execute well enough as a business to get funded without a track record are, it seems to me, already committing to bootstrapping their company.
A venture-funded business supports VC lifestyles as well as founder lifestyles, while a bootstrapped startup doesn't impact vc lifestyles (unless it competes with a vc-funded business).
vc-funding and bootstrapping are both legitimate options, but to describe the latter as a "lifestyle business" and the former as something else is absurd.
Look at it this way: 5 years ago, investment bankers were laughing at all of us. Did we care? Where do you think venture capitalists come from?