I Want Your AOL CDs
ascii.textfiles.com
ascii.textfiles.com
I remember when Wing Commander III came out and I bought a CD-ROM drive just so I could play it. At this special point in history, a typical hard-drive could store maybe one or two CD's worth of data at most. CD's were #$%^ing magical. Suddenly, games and educational programs could make use of video. Truly, it was a leap forward in technology.
Just a few years later, at university, the "brotherhood of the golden disk" was passing around the latest games on CD-R's. Diamond's first mp3 players were a curiosity the rich kids had, and we were playing mp3's we'd downloaded off of usenet on an ancient sparc3 that could just barely decode them in realtime. I splurged on a CD-R and suddenly I never had to delete anything ever again. When AOL discs arrived in the mail, it seemed strange that anyone would just give away something as valuable as CD's!
A few years later, I was using AOL CD's as coasters. I had a storage box built for 5-1/2" floppies that was now full of CD backups of files I'd never look at again. USB key drives had yet to arrive so, if I wanted to transfer tiny source files around, I'd burn a CD and not worry about all the wasted bits.
Today, a lot of computers don't even come with DVD drives. Apple never even bothered to properly support Bluray. By the time BD-R drives came out, hard-drives were an order of magnitude larger. Now they're nearly two orders of matnitude larger. Backing up a large hard drive onto BD-R's now would be more tedious than backing up a hard-drive to floppy discs when the first CD drives came out. Depending on where you are, it might actually be faster to transmit data half-way across the world than to burn it to a BD-R disk.
In high school, I loaned my best friend my life savings, $7000, with interest, $6k of which was used to purchase a CD writer, which he was planning to use to run a data backup service for local businesses (the other $1k was used to buy RAM... I think maybe 16MB?).
Personally, I find several facts in that paragraph kind of remarkable.
In retrospect, I think the interest rate did not reasonably reflect the high level of risk involved. The CD backup business didn't work out, and we had to renegotiate the terms of the loan, but he did pay me back.
oh and I think the media cost like $50 per burnable cd (or something like that).
At the time, linking IT to other subjects was in vogue. He bought about 5 educational CD-ROMs, for science, geography, history, etc, which had far more image and video content that anything we'd experienced before. I spent hours browsing them.
It was 2000-1 when someone in my class had sufficiently useful broadband for him to download DivX films and sell CD-Rs containing them, for about 50p per disc.
[1] http://chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/A5000.h... [2] http://chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/32bit_UpgradesA2G...
Not even that. IIRC 2GB drives were around but very expensive. 4GB units may even have been commonly available, but certainly not affordable for home use.
I think a little before then I got a 250MB drive to upgrade a PC that had 100MB in total (40MB and 60MB) so even counting it all I didn't have a full CD worth.
The race for size really seemed to heat up soon after though, the growth in multimedia content increasing consumer demand high enough to bring prices down (starting a spiral as people generally having more space encouraged developers and publishers to use more and higher definition content). IIRC 1GB drives (still only one-ana-bit full CDs worth) were fairly common in home PCs in 1996 (the year before I went to university), and a couple of tens of GB was common by 1999.
My parents were so cheap I didn't even have encarta but some cheap IBM branded clone.
CDs, DVDs and Blurays are just so cheap that i still write things to disk when I'm not certain i would need something in the future.
And i have to say it pays keeping things sometimes since the internet is ever changing and what used to be easy to find 10 years ago is almost impossible now.
I guess I'm somewhat of a collector just like the archive team.
Long term moving media will die but it has definitely surprised me how long they've managed to hold on and what capacities have been achieved.
So different than the time when an upgrade from 4x to 8x CD-R write speed was a big deal to me...
Blu-ray drives never made it into the "cheap" category, so if you don't know then it probably isn't.
Anyway, I figured a friend of mine might want them; he said he did, so I uploaded them to him (at my crappy 768kbit/s upload speed it took an entire weekend!). Upon completion he said he no longer wanted them.
Um.
Anyway, I just contacted Jason Scott. Hopefully he'll be willing to wait a few days. Or I could just burn the file to a BD-R, I have a bluray burner and a spindle of BD-Rs somewhere that I've never used.
I find your lack of faith in the internet disturbing.
(I really wish I had better upload speed.)
I still have friends who have aol email accounts, keeping them alive simply because the switch cost for them is too high.
AOL also helped anchor the tail-end of the East Coast's version of Silicon Valley, the Dulles Tech Corridor/Netplex...a place where literally half of the world's internet traffic passes through.
At some point they wised up and started putting stickers on the cases that you could not easily remove. Nevertheless, I still have tons of old CDs in AOL cases at home...
Never kept the AOL CDs unfortunately!
It definitely had a way of instilling a sort of wonder about what was "behind" all those windows, what was possible, and whether you could get it to do something it wasn't supposed to. Punters were the weirdest thing about AOL, because they could have easily fixed them but seemingly never did. If it stopped working in a new version, a simple modification would make it work again.
I remember building all kinds of weird "PrOgZ": punters, mass imers, emailers, scrollers, etc.
So much fun :D
If what you state would be true then the GPL wouldn't have a leg to stand on, physical copies are rarely if ever used!
The image would be a copy.
Otherwise, correct.