Zuckerberg's partnership with telecom giants, Internet.org, provides access to a fake Internet where selected services are prioritized over others. This scheme threatens innovation, free expression, and privacy online.
It blocks many of the websites, apps, and services the world loves from being made available on equal terms.
The fake Internet will also restrict access to local service providers struggling to get a foothold online.
Also, I don't think very highly of Mark Zuckerberg's ethics, especially with regard to users privacy, but he's a very effective leader and there's no sense getting angry with his success.
It is up to governments to regulate markets, we can't expect CEOs to do anything but promote their own agenda. If you want to get mad at someone, take it out on government regulators who are corrupt or otherwise fail to promote competition.
Then why are we still using SMTP for the majority of online communications? Once something gets entrenched, it's difficult to change at scale.
Loading a link, reading a few sentences, deciding if its useful to read more: it requires time.
A sort of standard short summarize to go with each link would make reading HN more efficient to me.