Stop overanalyzing and become the best version of yourself
blog.higg.so
blog.higg.so
Your intuition is as important an analytical tool and the best executioners have a natural balance between analyzing and intuition.
So if you know you are overanalyzing stop thinking and start feeling.
Furthermore I would claim that very rarely is it the case that you just don't have enough information if you have analyzing something. So in theory you are right but in reality it's never really the case.
it's about thresholds. the assumption is that ever-finer measurements (analysis) won't suddenly blowup into huge changes in weight (outcome)
Since you will probably spend on the order of tens of thousands of hours analysing things in your life, spending about twenty minutes analysing your thinking process is no big deal (referring to "I know I'm doing it right now")
Now sometimes you want to spend even more time analysing then the above rule suggests. When to do that is harder and requires a good intuition of the potential gains you could get by thinking a little bit more.
But for stuff like life choices or muddier problems, feeling is often the best option because all types of analysis will fail with insufficient data.
If you want to learn about overcoming "resistance," read Steven Pressfield, e.g. The War of Art .
The OP touches on both ideas but I don't see how it connects them. It also contains some all-too-commonly unexamined subtext. Is Richard Branson really the "best version" of all of us? Is an appetite for risk the only thing necessary to start and operate many large businesses, or don't you also need to cultivate an interest and aptitude for business, management, and people over the course of your life?
Really? As opposed to what?
Case in point, my boss at the moment does something I've noticed quite often in stupid people. As soon as the train of thought requires more than about 10 or 15 seconds of quiet thinking and analysis, he immediately changes the subject. He either changes the subject to something that (to my mind) is completely unrelated, or he makes some vague self-affirming statement.
On the one hand, this is annoying as fuck. On the other hand, if I look at it objectively, his brain is just wired that way. He doesn't have the capacity to break down an argument or situation to its atomic level, so his brain compensates by changing the subject and continuing the analysis, albeit on another topic.
It's really just another manifestation of the idea that our brains are constantly analysing things, but it just so happens that this manifestation is incredibly frustrating to anybody who enjoys getting to the bottom of and solving problems.
An analytical mind is itself a hinder for making decisions so you need to strike a balance.
And ex. a musician practice for thousands of hours (done that myself) they don't analyze. They can but thats not what makes you a good musicians.
Of course most people can do both, but often people are better at one or the other.
(Although usually, only people with analytical minds waste their time thinking about it.:)
Have you ever noticed differences in the level of awareness different people display? (And, indeed, the same person from day-to-day.)
Some people call it mindfulness, awareness, self-awareness, introspection, analytical, etc.
People vary greatly in their conscious awareness of the world around and inside themselves. When OP states "very analytical", they are saying they feel like they're more aware than they perceive other people to be.*
* This has its own considerations.