Frankencamera

Cool. I've thought about this a lot, just because the UX of now cheap older cameras tends to be very good, for me at least, and the UX of the low end digital tends to be very eh. > $1000 bodies, it's a different story of course. It isn't exactly clear what I meant by UX; With my Minolta SRT 201, I can see Aperture and Shutter speed at a glance, modify them with a quick, dedicated, dial twist, have a distance scale on the lens, and look through a large, somewhat bright viewfinder (Later Minolta viewfinders are noticeably brighter though). The mirrorless experience on the low end really can't compete. Cheap DSLRs are closer, but with shit viewfinders, and I hate the Canon top screen/dial system, and harder to adapt old lenses.

This means you can use the Shutter speed dial, the combo shutter button is a good idea that I did not think of at all (I always was thinking you'd use two buttons, one to put the digital side in BULB, then the actual shutter, cause I'm dumb). On the other hand, if I had a functional NEX-5, I don't think I would have the heart to do it, and 38mm is maybe a little long for m4/3 general purpose. I like ~40mm on APS-C.

Really I also kinda wanted to write the sensor driver, but sourcing decent sized image sensors seems impossible. I know some people who could maybe get me cell phone size samples, but m4/3? I don't even know how, and I'd need a decent datasheet too.

I did the boring lazy technique of putting my grandfather's Canon 50mm/f1.4 thread-mount rangefinder lens on a Leica M8 (used, since I'm not made of money). There are some nice, fast old lenses out there that take some very pretty pictures. https://instagram.com/p/16q6fPwAc2/

"I first tried printing my design at school but the quality wasn’t high enough for such detailed work, so I sent my design to a 3-D printing company in London which used the incredible SLS printing method to create a strong, accurate and flexible print in nylon."

Could you mention the company, or printer they used?

There is a cool Stanford project that at least used to go by the same name:

https://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/fcam/

http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/camera-2.0/

I use it on my Nokia N900.

This is an excellent example of how not to use javascript on your site. If you look in the html, all the content is there. But nothing displays for many seconds while some js is waiting for something else to load.

bah. Hoped this would be some kind of a neat large CMOS sensor/fpga/ARM SoC camera module which you can drop anywhere but basically it's just putting existing sony nex electronics inside an old camera body.

few years ago I had exactly the same idea. It's really great to see someone realized this.

I could imagine that this would be a great kick starter project. If there is a kit for me to do this, I will buy!

This is cute, but I'm entirely sick of people who think "I want to do a cool thing for myself, can you fund it through kickstarter" is OK.

more like Frankenwebsite, white page if no javascript for a simple blogpost... pass