> I hope I'm not the only one here who thinks this is incredibly ANTI-entrepreneurial.
How is it anti-entrepreneurial? Seems like a perfectly entrepreneurial response to the market opportunity created by overlap of the AirBnB vs. hotel conflict with the AirBnB vs. existing law conflict.
> I'll even go so far as to say this would be a really JERKY and EVIL thing to do.
Some people say that about the way that AirBnB and AirBnB hosts have openly flouted laws governing short-term rentals. Any disruptive entrepreneurial activity is going to "jerky and evil" from someone's perspective.
And, maybe it is jerky and evil -- but that's not a category opposed to entrepreneurship. At best, its an orthogonal concern.