It is not a very good post.
Nate takes one email and creates a strawman argument around it, claiming that the email is taken out of context and does not represent a smoking gun. He then ignores all the other 1078 or so emails.
Nate takes one email and creates a strawman argument around it, claiming that the email is taken out of context and does not represent a smoking gun. He then ignores all the other 1078 or so emails.
Maybe you're complaining that no one is really complaining about this specific email, but to me, this one looks a lot like the others contained in the stolen data that I've seen. From my perspective, it seems a lot of people are reading what they want into the emails, though I'll readily admit I haven't spent my day pouring through it, nor do I really intend to.
"I Read Through 160,000,000 Bytes of Hacked Files And All I Got Was This Lousy E-Mail"
It seems to imply to me to be a complete refutation of all the stolen data.
I'm usually a fan of 538 and feel pretty level headed in my opinions on global warming, but Nate could have definitely done better.