The link is even broken, but this is a tiny detail.
W3School have bad reputation [1] and is considered bad.
The link is even broken, but this is a tiny detail.
W3School have bad reputation [1] and is considered bad.
But really, if you want to learn html+CSS, you need to spend a bunch of time just making layouts if you want to get a mental model into your head. It is just too finicky to reason about otherwise
[0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/API/MutationObserv...
1: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/280478/why-not-w3sch... 2: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/87678/discouraging-w... 3: http://www.codecademy.com/forum_questions/4fd1d78b7e79680003...
But I still use W3S when it's the first result in google search and I am ok with it. It might not be the best learning resource but it's pretty great if you forgot some CSS property, or how some JS method is called. So W3S is fairly good as a cheat sheet.
Your connection is not private
Attackers might be trying to steal your information from www.w3schools.com (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID
... Scary for someone who's never seen it.
Bad form from Google -- really.