> If you want user replaceable everything that's your choice but don't try to associate that attribute with the build quality of a machine, and don't assume everyone else wants to replace parts themselves. The vast majority, do not.
Well among people who built desktop PCs for the whole life, the idea of having something completely closed and locked up is ludicrous. That's maybe what you don't understand, if you don't come from that culture (and if you don't enjoy that aspect of hardware). And the "Vast Majority" does not mean anything, most computers users nowadays are amateurs who have no computing background, that should not be a benchmark for considering if something is appropriate or not (fallacy).
> No one claims an Audi is not "well made" because the engine is not user-replaceable.
I don't know about Audi (I don't repair cars), but I know people who do in my close family, and who get really mad a newer cars whose engines are all locked into a single block as they cannot be repaired anymore. That's the Apple model for cars at work, and in the future kids won't even understand how cars or computers work since all they see is a black box that has no key. Even for educational purposes, it's essential to be able to see the innards of your machine.
> has zero to do with how well made the thing is.
Oh, and if you can't see it, how can you judge how well made it is ? It could be a glorious mess for all you know.