New study claims Transcendental Meditation 'cuts risk of heart attack by half'
telegraph.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
For empirical evidence, I linked to a popular thread where few people had negative things to say about Vipassana. Of the people that suggested alternative meditation styles, one was modded to 3 points and one was at 1 points.
The allegedly biased Wikipedia-cited scientific research:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_Meditation#Scien...
The article from Skeptic's Dictionary:
MetaFilter thread on whether or not it's worth the $2500:
http://ask.metafilter.com/22579/Is-it-worth-2500-to-learn-Tr...
Where's the control group? Classes about diet and exercise can be rather stressful to overweight people...
So, this study really compared against best practice. I don't see the problem. Comparing a new treatment against best practice is ethical when you are dealing with people's lives.
Are you suggesting that the researchers made one of these errors?