Debt, equity and a third thing that might work better
sethgodin.typepad.com
sethgodin.typepad.com
The coupon stream on mezz notes can be linked to income on specific assets (like covered bonds).
Subordinated debt and preferred shares are examples of mezz finance instruments.
as suggested in the article, you offer to double the investment by paying 4% of sales. that means you need to be bringing in $1.25 million in sales to repay the investor. using an (admittedly rough) assumption, let's say that takes 5 years to achieve. in the same time, if the investor had played it safe, their $25k would be (assuming compounded monthly interest at the 10% rate) $41k i.e. almost doubled anyway.
in the current economic climate 10% interest might be higher than expected and you could obviously fiddle around with all the numbers/assumptions to make it a more attractive investment but my instinct is that to sell this to the types of investors who would entertain something like this, it could end up being a more expensive way of raising finance than it initially appears.
i use lendingclub.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lending_Club
during less severe economic times you could also make around 10% via high yield savings accounts
And the highest I've ever seen for high yield savings accounts was around 6%, generally only for a promotional period, around 2007. Unless you're talking about the high inflation years in the late 70s and early 80s, in which case, yes, you could get 10% in a savings account, but the real rate of return was well into the negative due to inflation.
An instrument with a risk adjusted return of 10%/year is called a junk bond.
EDIT: although I'm not sure if anyone's really doing corporate bonds that are linked to profits, that might be new.
Having said all that, I agree with Seth that society could do with being a lot more creative in how it funds businesses.
It's a sensible idea which, if put into practice, might result in funding of a wider range of startups. As Godin pointed out, a lot of VC funding is highly stilted toward businesses that can sell out in a short time frame (go public or get bought), not just businesses that can become profitable in that time frame.
edit - more here on the origins of the idea: http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/10/07/royalty-based-vent...