Dude, no one will ever buy that online. AKA how incumbents get Pwned in tech
breakingvc.com
breakingvc.com
(As an aside, nearly twenty years ago, I bought a mattress from the Denver Mattress Company, who were (and are) selling and manufacturing great mattresses for a fraction of the price of the big players. You want to talk about innovation? Talk about those guys, not three hipsters in Brooklyn who got some VC money last year and used it to buy generic foam mattresses from a Chinese supplier.)
That said, there's no way in the world that this market is big enough to support this many startups. Mattresses weren't sold in stores because the companies didn't think people would buy them online; mattresses are/were sold that way because they're like cars -- people buy a new one once a decade. It's hard to build a big business unless you're extracting maximum margin per item sold. It's even harder when five other identical "scrappy insurgencies" are competing on price in the low end of the market.
But hey, cheap VC dollars means cheap mattresses for you. Everyone is thinking about gross revenue and "disruption", but nobody is thinking about business models.
Imagine a few decades from now, when practically every type of software startup will have been already been tried 100+ times. Maybe the increasing focus on startup "team quality" that's already happening will be a big part of the answer to that question.
But the rise of five new mattress startups in the last few years? That's just sloppy, herd behavior. Investors are piling into whatever sector seems hot, without doing even the most cursory analysis of the existing players. Why should the 7th startup in this vertical be seen as compelling? Is it because they have bike messengers?
Point being, once something can be done well enough online, people will do/buy/use it.
This is the one I got: http://home.woot.com/offers/purasleep-memory-foam-mattress-4...
That's just not true. Their queen mattress costs $850, equal or above many of the listed competitors.
It's damned fantastic, though the entire experience was foreign as hell to me. I was able to order it online (for $700, I think, for the King model), have it delivered on the day I selected. While nobody set it up for me, it came in a box that just sort of fully expanded as I cut it open.
I don't have any particular insight on Casper, but it seems like, to me at least, T&N sort of proved the market, so unless my timeline is off, Casper seems like far less of a gamble than the first entrant to a market would be.
The only oddity I've noticed (not a complaint, but different) compared to traditional mattresses is that there's no bolstering on the sides, but understanding how it's made, that's expected. It is different tho, as pushing on the edge of the mattress, historically, has always yielded resistance, while my Tuft & Needle mattress is just as soft there as everywhere else.
That's fair. I'm more than happy to throw my receipts into Imgur for anyone who thinks I'm a shill. Awesome mattresses, A++ would buy again.
It would be a weird thing to do, but even something like creating fake bank statements isn't particularly hard.
(I'm not implying you are a shill, just commenting on the utility of links to imgur in verifying anything)
(So I would probably take a receipt you posted at face value, but it would be impossible for me to verify it)
The biggest distinction between T&N and Casper seems to be on the types of materials they use. There's some interesting technical details (some provided by the Casper founders) in this thread from last year at Mattress Underground: http://www.themattressunderground.com/mattress-forum/general...
As a millennial, I'm really dying to know what it feels like to sleep on a millennial mattress.
https://hbr.org/1990/07/reengineering-work-dont-automate-obl...
Noophilia is a disease. You would be well-advised to excise it from your...you.