A look at Stanford computer science: Challenges of a growing field
stanforddaily.com
stanforddaily.com
Although I was in EE at Stanford, I took a bunch of CS classes, and hands down Nick Parlante (an instructor, not a professor) was the best actual teacher that I had. CS108 and CS193i
Plus it is possibly that these persons actually make better teachers as opposed to quite a few professors, who are more preoccupied with research, tenure, grad students, etc.
At my grad school, the joke was that Nobels were more important for admissions than academics.
That's pathetic. It's not like Stanford doesn't have the money.
Also what's wrong with stats teachers teaching machine learning?
CS hasn't been an S for that long, so I think you can rely on these other fields somewhat.
this might have been possible at my school and not possible elsewhere based on how the different departments are focused / rewarded / isolated. more math profs might have been interested in getting CS experience back then.
This seems very strange. Are universities still so far in the dark ages of management accounting that they don't give departments more money if they have more students taking their classes? I understand it won't be purely proportional (Philosophy departments may need to have small classes and require subsidies) but if a department grows 3X, shouldn't the resources at least grow somewhat? Say 2X or 2.5X? If not, it's a recipe for disaster.
Part 1 -> http://www.stanforddaily.com/2015/04/15/a-look-at-stanford-c...