Last.Backend – Visual Docker Containers Orchestration
lastbackend.com
lastbackend.com
This shit with "enable security" as after-thought has to stop.
Next: installer update. Give us few minutes.
Overall Rating: C This server is vulnerable to the POODLE attack. If possible, disable SSL 3 to mitigate. Grade capped to C.
Asking people on HN to send their passwords in the clear is suicide.
Looks super neat but I'll pass.
[0] http://lastbackend.com/guide/ [1] https://docs.docker.com/reference/run/
Troubling.
"Development and deployment never been so simple"
The grammar error here is a little jarring to native English speakers, and it's particularly noticeable because it's in the tagline. Fixing that would make a better first impression.
"Development and deployment have never been so simple" would work better, IMHO. Or perhaps you'd prefer "Development and deployment made simple", in keeping with the terse / minimalist theme.
While I'm at it, a few other minor corrections, in roughly decreasing importance the further down the page we go:
"GitHub and BitBucket integrations allows you automate DevOps." should be "GitHub and BitBucket integrations allow you to automate DevOps."
"Servers and Clouds linking" should probably be "Link Servers and Clouds" for verb consistency with previous headings; "Create... Build... Link... Manage... " is consistent, whereas "Create... Build... ..Linking... Manage..." is not.
"You can link your server to Last.Backend with special command. Just copy it and execute in a terminal." could be "You can link your server to Last.Backend with a special command. Just copy it and execute it in a terminal."
Finally, "Just look at scheme and you can see what's going on. Color element indication provide all information about all warning and problems. Logs output gives you ability to know much more." could be improved as "Just look at the scheme to see what's going on. Colored elements convey information about warnings and problems at a glance. Log output provides the ability to know much more." (or similar)
HTH! :)
could be
Please help us create a useful tool for developers.
Every time I read about linking containers I start wondering if they have fixed the proxy scenario. Essentially, multiple DBs that need to connected to a proxy, when you bring up a new DB you don't want to have to restart the proxy container in order to update the links.
I know docker is built to link from application server to db, and not the other way around. So for our production server we have each DB create an apache config file and then hot reload the apache server.
This system provide linking between different servers. If you have some feedback - please provide us! We need it! ) Thx a lot for comment :)
Would be nice if it used your own domain (HTTPS is essential!) and if the script didn't require super user from the outset (or perhaps it could explain what it is going to do, and then request super user permissions)
2. Emails with dots not accepted by your sign up form
3. Drag and drop not working in firefox
4. I created Ubuntu 14 droplet with DigitalOcean, and inserted your "connect new servers" command there. Got result:
Run agent on stack Error response from daemon: no such id: lb time="2015-04-18T16:33:03-04:00" level=fatal msg="Error: failed to remove one or more containers"
When I'm trying to "run" my server into your app, I'm getting message "Available server instance not found"
- "Development and deployment have never been so simple" on two lines, line break after "deployment"; "Development and deployment have never been so simple"
- Autoplay the "Stack constructor" animation
- Maybe add a automatic sliding for "Build and deploy apps" slides
- Autoplay the "Link Servers and Clouds"
- The "Watch video" should be right at the very top of page with a nice screengrab + big (>) play button in the middle
- Any particular purpose for enclosing headers with : characters?
Unfortunately, chances are good that we will need to go with more established services for now, but we'll definitely be keeping an eye on you guys to see how things progress.
Have a nice day!
P.S. couldn't send any message through neither Intercom nor support button at the top.
Also, I didn't log with GitHub because I didn't want to give write access to anything. You should give the option to only request the email address.
Not an ad for slack just the only reference to what i meant i could think of right now
Btw, check the pricing page in Mobile Safari. It looks quite off. The width is wrong the there is text overlapping in the first panel.
Could this have been designed in a fashion that doesn't require me to roll another bloody account?
Not so interested that I feel like opening one, sorry.
Primarily, I just hate accounts. I have hundreds of them man. It's absurd. I don't bother trying to log in to most of them any more, if it's not a service I use every day I go directly to recovering the username and password, because I'll never get it in the three or five or 10 tries I'm allowed before the account is locked/they start giving me captchas. Often enough, that system breaks, and then I'm left having to email admins and beg them to help. That's always a fun coin to toss.
So I don't make 'em any more, unless I literally have to. Quite seriously, the only new account I recall opening in the last two years is with the Australian government, because it was mandatory to do my tax return via that system. Maybe there's one or two others, I don't know. e: I remember the other one, it's this one! tada, own goal!
I'm currently locked out of the government system, because their secret question/answer system didn't like my answers. I have to call them during business hours to fix it. I moved to another country recently, so that's going to be cheap and stuff.
Secondarily, I'm starting to critique peoples use of accounts. Lots of people implement a username/password system when they don't need it, because it's easy to do so. As a developer myself, I am taking a stand against lazy development.
Maybe I don't fully grasp your product (I'll be honest, the instant I saw "sign up now" my shutters went down), but it seems like a graphical docker container configuration management tool is less effective as a web app than a desktop app, and doesn't need an account system either way.
For example, if you're using the accounts for saving flow setups, could that not be done with a combination of URL parameters (encoding customer specific data like IP addresses) and page ID's to a key-value database (with the benefit of data de-duplication), thus allowing me to save my work with a simple ctrl-d to bookmark it? As a side benefit, I can share it just by emailing it to people.
Hey, maybe I'm wrong, maybe your system really does need accounts, but I'm still not going to make one. I have to draw the line somewhere if I want this endless account sprawl to end.
A display application like that would be useful for AWS, so you know roughly what's going on in your rented subcloud. With, of course, both big screen and phone app versions. From the other comments, it seems that this startup has a poor container management system but a great visualization tool. There are lots of container management systems (one written in Go was announced on HN yesterday) but many are still at the command line level for monitoring. Maybe this startup should pivot and do "cloud management visualization".
Those have existed for a while, e.g. VisualOps[1].