Sometimes we don't reveal our true motives to The New York Times.
HN is supposed to be a place for intelligent discussion: giving unsourced cynicism equal weight as evidence is creating an echo chamber for pseudo-intellectuals to parrot their beliefs.
Also, because somebody doubted the honesty of a CEO, you decide to talk about how they are a pseudo-intellectual in an echo chamber who parrots their baseless cynicism?
What would be your incentive to hire two college grads you'll need to invest in training versus candidates with years of experience and skills?