fair enough!
> get at the essence of what shebang-style unix scripting was about
FWIW, although convoluted, you can do that with guile, with:
#!/usr/bin/guile \
-e main -s
Or simpler with chicken: #!/usr/bin/csi -sfair enough!
> get at the essence of what shebang-style unix scripting was about
FWIW, although convoluted, you can do that with guile, with:
#!/usr/bin/guile \
-e main -s
Or simpler with chicken: #!/usr/bin/csi -sSome good examples of scsh scripting (some by the author, Olin Shivers) can be found at
http://scsh.net/resources/scripts.html
The manual is also very good:
The acknowledgements section made my morning, thanks.
Last time I checked a package for scsh for Fedora was somehow broken and/or conflicting with Chicken and I went with the latter. In general I like the idea and APIs of scsh, I'm just afraid that there will be no one to ask for help if I hit some problems. With Chicken or Racket the communities are active and it's easy to find support. How does this look in case of scsh?