Thank You
weblog.raganwald.com
weblog.raganwald.com
Not the silly over the top devotion some people exhibit (I actually dislike that) but the silent respect and appreciation exhibited (like, for example signs announcing uniformed service men get into XYX free/cheap or the way uniformed people were generally treated or the seriousness devoted to days like today)
If there is one thing I could bring back here to the UK and instill it would be that.
Any veterans/service folks care to comment?
It's really tough, I won't lie to you. Walking up to a total stranger and saying something from the heart, to me at least, is very unnatural.
Usually I ask them a bit about where they are stationed, what they've been doing, whether or not they've been deployed. Just small talk. But before I leave I try to make physical contact -- patting them on the shoulder usually -- and say something like "Hey, I just wanted to say thank you. You guys are doing an awesome job."
Every time I've done it I get the weirdest reaction. At first they're totally convinced I am going to say something ugly right afterwards. Then they look confused for a couple of seconds. Then it's like the sun opens up from behind clouds: it's really, really cool. Makes you feel good the rest of the day (and I'm sure it makes their day as well)
The reason the Russian army isn't in western europe is not due to the heroic effort of the Queen's Cavalry - it's due to the ability to knock two pieces of Plutonium together.
It's the nerds/geeks at Aldermaston/LLNL/Los Alamos/ Sarov/Zheleznogorsk that have kept the world safe for you.
You can't imagine the morale-boosting effect it has to simply have strangers come up and say "thank you?"
Deleted comment
(edit: the [deleted] was someone asking, basically, why "thank you" specifically).
I guess less so with the current armed forces, since the threat was further away, and fewer of us were touched by it personally (most people I know have grandparents who were involved in one of the Great Wars; not everyone knows a modern-day serviceman). Plus the issue of the war itself; I believe anti-war sentiment about the recent wars is higher than it was for WWI and WWII, and what there was then is very much blurred by time, victory and countless readings of war poetry in high school. Dulce et decorum est, pro patria mori.
I hope the pay for soldiers in the US is OK - maybe the height of the pay correlates with the "solemness"? Like suppose every soldier would get 1000000$ per year, would they still be solemnly thanked?
We entrepreneurs often talk of our way of life as something we choose quite explicitly over financial security. I'm pretty sure the success of an army depends a lot on it's soldiers thinking roughly the same way about their chosen path.
Finally, my impression is that the United States is build on a certain mentality that's difficult for us Europeans to fully grasp. The country was founded by people fleeing from prosecution and suppression, and it's first war was fought against that same suppression trying to catch up. That mentality lies pretty deep in Americans, as I understand. It has nothing to do with cheating people into collecting our garbage and manning 24-hour convenience stores.
It's a shame that thankfulness to esp. US and UK troops isn't better founded in western European minds, and that it's only brought up when trying to justify a new war. Fact is that 400.000 Americans died in WWII, without whom my German would probably be a lot better. There's a D-day burial ground in Normandy. Any European should make a point of visiting it sometime (I haven't yet) -- especially before making high-brow intellectual rants against war.
4 out of the 5million German military casualties were on the Eastern Front, The Russian army had a not insignificant role in Germany's defeat.
I think many soldiers are from poor backgrounds, though. Not sure how many chose to become a soldier for the excitement, or because it offers them a good chance at a better life. Again sorry, I don't have good answers. Overall, though, I think words are cheap and improving pay is maybe better. Soldiers provide a service to society, society should pay.
While the Heritage Foundation is not an entirely neutral institution, its methodology in this study seems fairly sound. And its findings don't support the popular belief that American soldiers are disproportionately poor and ill-educated and only joined because they had no alternatives.
Anecdotally, I've found this to be true for all of the American soldiers I have met and spoken to about their backgrounds and their reasons for enlisting.
[1] - http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/cda08-05.c...
Much as I can sympathize with the material it feels to me like it is decidedly not hacker news, and even though it scored an astronomical number of votes I still feel that way and can't seem to find a reason why this should be here at all.
The problem I have with it is if this is so much in vogue that opens the door to lots of people whose posts got killed (past and future both) to point here and say, look: this is hacker news.
I flagged it pretty much when you posted it and am quite surprised to see it still up, I do sympathize with the sentiment of your post, I just can't make the connection with HN.
The question of fighting for true freedom and equality is deeply connected with the motivations behind startups and hacking in my brain.
That's why I posted it here but not on reddit.
update: In the USA it is Veteran's Day, not Remembrance Day. So there has been quite a bit of discussion here about thanking living veterans and veterans of all wars, some of which are controversial. But my post thanked an unnamed soldier who died in a conflict where we were fighting for human justice. I had WWII in my mind when I wrote it very specifically.
Even if you disagree whether it belongs on HN, I hope you now understand why I thought the question of what our world would be like had Fascism prevailed and who would or wouldn't be here and who would or wouldn't fraternize with each other would be "Of interest to Hackers."
pax.
Strange, but it does illustrate how many of us respect those who serve.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Morrison
Downvote me if you must, but as you do consider deeply the message you send when you thank men and women for engaging in war.
So, I might think that Britain's involvement in Iraq was a mistake and should not have happened, but I would shake the hand of any British serviceman who served there and thank them for doing so.
Our service men and women are committed to fighting to better our country and the world. They trust their superiors to make the right decisions. You can disagree with the bad decisions of those superiors, but the service men and women will be there fighting regardless of whether it was right or wrong because the cost of missing the right call is too high.
Honor the troops, not the politicians.
Apologies for invoking Godwin's Law, but this is quite precisely where the analogy is applicable.
From The Twilight Zone episode "Death's Head Revisited": "They just heard you offer the apology for all the monsters of our time . We did as we were told, we functioned as ordered, we merely carried out directives from our superiors. Familiar, is it, Captain? It was the Nazi theme music at Nuremburg. The new lyrics to the Gotterdammerung. The plaintive litany of the master race as it laid dying. We did not do, others did, or someone else did it. We never even knew it was being done or We did it, but others told us to."
I now cringingly await the downvotes.
Thank you, this is the first time I've seen it argued the people enlisting realize and accept the country is likely to squander their time and risk their lives over nothing worthy of them. I could never reconcile their somehow overlooking that with the dedication they bring to the work.
The worst case isn't that soldiers' time is squandered or that they risk their lives over nothing worthy, it's that they kill and destroy needlessly, but I guess we don't really tend to come to terms with that fact as well as the people we're fighting.
For example: would we make the same distinction between the bureaucrats and policymakers in China, and the programmers who make the Great Firewall actually work? From my perspective, the person who actually carries out the action, not the one who tells them to, is the one who is responsible for it, good or bad. We don't praise politicians when a firefighter does their job; why should we blame the politicians when a soldier does theirs?
Not that I pretend to understand any of it, mind you. God knows I have no bloody clue what it's like to be in a war, so perhaps I'm entirely off-base.
(As an aside, I'm not going to comment on the moral legitimacy or lack thereof of soldiers, wars, etc., because in this context it's more a matter of personal moral beliefs than anything else.)
What bothers me is the notion that people are not responsible for their own actions.
Edit: We are, of course, assuming the existence of some objective notion of "responsibility" here, which is a point that could be debated. That said, I think I'm going off topic now, so I'll be quiet.
I believe those who hold that logic, myself included, have different expectations of the responsibilities of the soldier and the henchman. The soldier is in a strict hierarchical organization that demands its members follow orders for the organization to continue operating. Members lower in the organization are expected to begin working before they understand why, so they aren't held responsible for everything they do. The henchman may also be a part of an organization like that, but he is just another citizen, working for his organization and own betterment, and is expected to be responsible for his actions. Also, he can hardly say that his organization is working on behalf of his entire nation, as the soldier can.
edit: I should add, that this perspective does eventually reach a breaking point as time passes servicemen begin to see what the goals of their leaders are, and if they disagree with them then they may be obligated, morally or otherwise, to excuse themselves or switch sides.
Looking back at your comment I see that you're speaking of henchman and mob bosses only, but as a proxy for state leaders and the military. But my point is that people don't see them the same.
I am worried though, that when an enemy is not so clear and obvious, this line of reasoning can be used by unscrupulous leaders to further their own goals. When the threat the "enemy" poses is so vague and unclear, as is the case for the conflicts that we (the US; I am an American and can only speak for the US), have been involved with since WWII, it becomes harder to swallow that all of the deaths our soldiers cause are anything but murder and volunteering to be placed in such a position is anything but honorable. Thus, the analogy of a mob boss and a thug.
I think you'd probably object to my ignoring the totality of the situation - a murder has been committed. But what's the harm in murder as long as it's happening external to "our civilization"?
What exactly are you thanking the serviceman for if not for carrying out acts you oppose? And how are we ever going to stop politicians from starting some pretty horrendous wars if we can only thank the armies who's job is to carry out their orders, no matter how awful.
My situation may be different from yours. Perhaps I am being too selfish: I sincerely believe I would not be here today had the Canadians sat out WWI and WWII. I sincerely believe that almost everything I love about Hacking and Hacker Culture would not exist in Canada and the USA had Fascists dominated Europe. If I make a list of people in this industry that I admire, I keep coming up with ethnicities and gender preferences that would have been oppressed and/or exterminated.
My message is somewhat overwrought and emotional, but I'm very clear on how I am the recipient of the greatest gift of all.
Most of the other wars that have produced countless veterans were wars of aggression though.
I know two vietnam vets personally (I don't have that much exposure to the US other than online and from when I lived 'nearby'), and neither of them is at all proud of what happened and sincerely despise politicians and everything associated with that era. They didn't have much choice about being there though, and at the time they thought it was a good thing.
The lesson I guess is that you should not let stuff like this blind you, and you should always be on guard that you do not become someone elses tool.
Moreover, it takes courage to enter into the armed forces and be one of the people who sacrifices their personal goals to protect our civilization. So we have a holiday set aside for those people.
I don't think the wars in Vietnam or Iraq were very wise, either. But it seems out of place and immature to sound that drumbeat on this holiday, like an atheist who feels compelled to demonstrate outside of churches on Christmas.
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a791...
The world is a complex place, full of little contradictions.
Remembrance day commemorates WWI.
Soldiers who had the courage NOT to enter the forces in WWI were shot.
The aim of WWI was not to protect civilisation, it was a disagreement over the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires' role in the Balkans.It got somewhat out of hand because the various armies had not noticed that technology had moved on a little since the battle of Waterloo.
[0] - His closing speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcvjoWOwnn4
Thank You to all men and women everywhere who fight for liberty... however that may be.
The common thread in your responses seems to be that politicians, not soldiers, are responsible for wars. My response to this idea is that one must not conflate "dying for freedom" with "killing for freedom". We should certainly oppose the enemies of liberty, but not by glorifying violence. It has always been, and will forever be, possible to oppose something without killing your fellow human beings. For this to succeed, however, you must have the courage to enter the fray with your arms at your sides.
I think a day like today has as much room for Norman Morrison as it does for the soldiers currently suffering and dying on our behalf. I'll remember both, if I can.
Over here in Sweden we don't have a similar holiday, which is probably connected to the fact that the veterans from our last war died well over a hundred years ago (not counting UN peace keeping operations).
War remains an ugly part of life. As it becomes increasingly remote for the majority of the West's inhabitants it is especially important to honour those who have sacrificed and those who continue to make sacrifices on our behalf.
- Albert Einstein
I wonder if this quote came before or after the Manhattan Project.
This has been well understood for 340 year, but let's take it one more time:
When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.
- Edmund Burke, Thoughts on the Cause of Present Discontents, 1770
Non-violence works best when you are a large majority against a small, civil minority, which was the case in India, as well as for the civil right movements Ghandi inspired. Ask Chamberlain how well it worked against a large, angry, un-civil nation.
As well articulated Einstein's observation is, it is hopelessly naïve, as well as ironic, considering his membership of a group that owes it's very existence today to large-scale heroism at command and killing under the cloak of war.
Deleted comment
So my theory is that kids that enlist are in the same boat as I was. They have just completed 12 years of statist indoctrination, watched all the movies celebrating war, are praised by friends and family for the idea of enlisting, and have few job prospects (especially with today's economy).
Just my .02
Till such time though, I thank the brave few of the world, dedicated in ensuring peace for their countrymen. All of you, I salute.
Everything else is propaganda and lies you've been telling yourself so you can sleep at night.
Remembrance day is about honouring the terrible sacrifice of soldiers, and reminding ourselves of the horror of wide-spread warfare. All soldiers, regardless of their allegiance, were compelled to fight by forces out of their control, and driven by political motivations they had no hand in. Therefore I honour the Germans as easily as I honour and remember my own grandfather who fought in Italy.
I think your comment was more directed at Germany as a country, but I thought I'd throw in my two cents.
Who would have the authority to forbid it? Naturally, they don't do it on the 11th of November, they have [Volkstrauertag](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkstrauertag) (the "national day of mourning") which takes place "two sundays before the first of Advent", which yields the Sunday nearest to the 16th of November (can be any time from the 13th to the 19th, this year it'll be on the 15th).
The 11th is actually the starting date of the German Carnival.
(Further edit: It is, in some sense, a credit to them. I had to include C because there are many examples in history of ethnic cleansings conducted with no evident regret, before, during, or after. The Germans may be disturbed by their history, but anyone who has taken the time to learn how it happened must also come away disturbed, as it is so easy to see it happening in other places as well, even right where you live, and stopping it is easier said than done.)
And thanks for the feedback, I was indeed curious.
So, yeh, they do commemorate but not today.
(although it must be said that whilst sombre remembrance is an excellent thing a carnival is, in my eyes, no less of a celebration; being of the belief that the best way to honor the dead is celebrate/appreciate life :))
Whether there are public tributes to soldiers in modern Germany is obviously a different issue, given that country's understandable ambivalence to its soldiers who fought in WWII, but that does not take away from the fact that, in the West, the events marking today are neither triumphant nor overly militaristic. In fact, today's events were started as a commemoration of the end of WWI, a war which had shaken the world to its core with its till-then unprecedented horror, brutality and human toll.
Every time I turn on the news and hear about Kandahar and Jalalabad I remember this song, written almost thirty years ago. What in the hell is wrong with humanity? Do we really need to go through this all over again?
Thanks to all those who serve so that we can go to sleep without fear every night and wake up peacefully every morning!
I personally know a guy who had half his face blown off in Iraq. He also just spend 10 months looking for a new job. All during that time he maintained his good spirits and generosity. He is a role model to his adopted kids (one of which is in ROTC) and his community.
I thank him and everyone like him for their service, sacrifice and the example they set for others.
(Beats spending the day grumbling about how I am still opposed to the US being in Iraq, at least.)
But I would say that it is supposed to be for all veterans, versus Memorial Day, which is to honor the dead.