I agree with the "None", but for a slightly different reason. When someone follows a person it is intended to be because the ideas that that person presents are worth knowing about. But, even the best do not produce an unbroken stream of perfect articles and ideas; so I don't follow anyone, instead I keep some websites in mind as resources to consult.

In the long run it is the content that matters, not the content creator.

If I did follow anyone it would be a set of obscure computer scientists like Tony Hoare (mostly retired), Christopher Strachey (deceased), Leslie Lamport (still working for Microsoft), Joe Armstrong (very much still working on Erlang); but even so it is the content of the papers they write and the code that they have given us that matters.