SeatGeek Raises $62M
blogs.wsj.com
blogs.wsj.com
Really thought they had a great product on their hands and have used it quite a bit. They've done great work building both a great product as well as an engineering and product driven company.
wish them good luck, but this is one of those domains that just sucks...
Not only this, but TM/LN actually own a ton of venues. They seem to grow in size monthly.
Here is the latest: http://blog.livenationentertainment.com/blog/Blog-Details/20...
There really is a monopoly on the market.
"SeatGeek helps people find and buy tickets to sporting events, concerts, Broadway shows, nightclubs and a range of other live entertainment through its mobile app or website." This is targeting TM/LN market for sure.
They don't have the connections that TM/LN have that allow them to gobble up a venue/festival monthly.
http://www.livenationentertainment.com/
Those are some hard stats to follow.
Despite all of this, I'd love to see SeatGeek succeed. Hopefully some of this funding will help them.
It was not sold. It merged with LYV to be valued at 50% of a $2.5bil company. It's now a $5bil company.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/02/10/us-ticketmaster-li...
2.5b enterprise value inlcuding debt. not 2.5b equity.
> TM owns this market and frankly, the issue has nothing to do with tech, and everything to do with the way professional sports and concert marketing works from a biz perspective.
Props to you for realizing the complexity of the business side. Most folks don't realize how complicated the world of ticketing is.
I do think you underestimate the value of technology. Ticketmaster effectively figured how to solve some really hard problems, similar to how we solve inside Google today.
The difference is TM did it with VAX assembler and for very focused use cases.
They quickly took demolished the competition and began setting up long term contracts, usually between 3 and 10 years with each venue.
Then, in 2010 they merged with LiveNation who owns a vast majority of some of the nations largest, most popular venues.
Major artists' managers and promoters all have close ties to TM/LiveNation as well, because it's where the money is. So when Taylor Swift goes on tour, these folks make sure they hit a TM venue at each stop along the way.
That's just the tip of the iceberg, but you get the gist.
One particular supplier seemed to have a lock on that industry and was milking it for all its worth.
Odeon wasn't helped by using packet switched radio links that blocked - that's right only 1 person at a time could make a booking at an individual cinema (well the big one in lecister square had 2 links)
It all boils down to pretty much being a solo founder. I always hired or found code monkeys to help turn my front end coded designs/ideas into a working product. None of these coders cared the same 500% percent I do for my start-ups. I.E. In December a Fortune 500 company wanted to become our client and I wanted to make this happen. I wasn't sure if I should make this company sign a licensing agreement or not. An advisers said they should, though I wasn't sure and wish I had a co-founder who cared as much as I do to discuss this decision with. It was a turning point for my start-up and the deal ultimately fell through (crushing).
Having a team/co-founders that are vested the same 500% is utmost important. Especially, if your not a schmoozer with tons of charisma and or a unicorn with great luck!
SeatGeek has a wonderful product but I feel we're positioned in the market a lot better because of the access to a large number of primary tickets. We can uniquely do some things (like giving fans early access to onsales). Our products are currently lacking but we have many things internally going on that will change that.
(If you are in LA and would be interested in helping, email me)
I love their UI and onboarding process, and used it to get tickets to one of last year's world series games.
Oh, but it's an "app". Totally innovative, then.