The point of omnipresent surveillance is to be proactive and prevent threats before they arise. There is no way to measure its success. If you oppose it, pick a better reason to base your argument on.
Threats to what?
> There is no way to measure its success.
Convenient
> If you oppose it, pick a better reason to base your argument on.
If you support it, pick a better reason to base your argument on.
If success can't be measured then there is no success.
Throughout history, suspicionless surveillance has been carried out by mafioso to oppress and control.
Of your suspicionless surveillance, you assert "this time is different". The assertion fails.
The Nazis could use your arguments word for word on dissenters of the Gestapo.
Where did I do that?