I could inform you about non-secret stuff like culture, but you wouldn't believe me. You want to believe that these are horrible small-minded people who don't think twice about violating your rights. The reality is they are anything but that.
True believers with good intentions.
Correct, and the evidence available so far strengthens that belief.
> even though you are, on average, less informed about their mission and activities,
That's not my fault though, I'd love to be more informed, but hey, secrets!
> less intelligent,
Quite probably.
> and lazier.
That's very well possible but I actually highly doubt it.
So, why the insults? Did you feel somehow implicated?
>On average they'll be very intelligent and working harder than their counterparts in industry for less money.
People all want to feel that they're doing good things, and not evil. They'll rationalize all sorts of things to believe that.
What would the cognitive bias to rationalize it as bad be?
The reason I believe it is bad is because it violates the spirit of the 4th amendment. It gives incredible power to an organization with no effective oversight. It lacks proper judicial review, and the existing supposed review has been shown to be a farce. It makes everyone using technology less secure. It wastes everyone's resources who have to work against and around the NSA.
Everyone knows they are being watched, listened to, tracked everywhere.
The big deal, though, is the power concentration and chilling effect of such massive surveillance even the Stasi couldn't dream of.
I don't care that not everyone working for / at the NSA is small-minded or not because in the end, the sum of all those individuals failed at being moral.
You're asking us to believe something ridiculous on its face, that there AREN'T these horrible small-minded people who don't think twice about violating our rights. Congress is packed full of people like that, but there aren't any at the NSA, ehe?