Google Maps Pacman
google.com
google.com
until they kill it off entirely :\
there is no version of the GL-enabled maps that ever ran faster or better for me than the basic tiled original.
Then I'll backspace out and re-type what I already typed, and Gmail highlights and decides I must want the third entry in the list for some reason, and makes it highlighted. So I'm moving over to the arrow keys.
The same kind of behavior in the search input as you're describing, too. Sometimes I get auto-suggest appearing after only one keystroke, sometimes it takes two. There seems to be no rhyme or reason, other than after a while I can usually somehow predict when my query will begin to be understood by the suggestion engine.
The inconsistency is really jarring, but just below the threshold where I start looking for another service because of how much it annoys me. Sort of like when my external monitor is physically positioned on the left side of my desk, but every time I plug it into the laptop it gets the virtual location off the right side of my screen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Hr...
Holy crap it's fast. Wow. There's no loading or giant pixels, zooming is instant, scrolling around is instant. I can't get over how much faster this is. Woof.
server load would have a statistically imperceptible impact here; never seen a google product roll out with scale-related issues, especially one as mature as their gmaps architecture was at the time of the GL switch.
EDIT: the image-based maps is a great example of the "Choose Boring Technology" thread [1]. the benefits of the GL maps, IMO, do not justify the enormous speed sacrifice, at least to the end users. i'm sure google's ultimate plan was/is to merge google earth and "3d/vr/augment all the things!", but for basic maps it is just terrible. i'm really sad about the whole situation because they really have great looking, readable tilesets, much better than OSM (even if less complete). sadly, they never did get the pixel-density-appropriate versions made for mobile devices and all the features looked tiny when implemented using their js maps api :(
This means that they can show different businesses to you based on your searches, and possibly some day charge businesses to be "put on the map".
And, it is. But Blackberry Maps is soo much nicer for the "just show me where I am on a map" use-case. Street names are shown, and displayed in large font, and the interaction is much faster than GM now. Google Maps has better data and more information like shops and transit... but the experience of using it is frustrating in comparison.
I'll start https://www.google.com/maps/@42.6395308,-71.3158648,18z/data...
http://gameinternals.com/post/2072558330/understanding-pac-m...
https://www.google.com/maps/@39.4314342,-74.5802579,18z/data...
metagame: find the hardest/simplest level on earth :) (I got Manhattan vs Tokyo)
It's not a great grid overall, but the zig-zag crookedness of Lombard Street is pretty fun to go through: https://www.google.com/maps/@37.8020373,-122.4196734,18z/dat...
Actually, in terms of snaking streets, while Snake Alley in Iowa is not as long, it makes for a much more playable grid: https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8118721,-91.1064303,18z/data...
I feel so left out.
EDIT: I was wrong, just that it is not available in Safari. Works with Chrome.
Finally tried in Chromium on Debian and wow, fun!