>OJ was acquitted, after all
Do you know something that the jurors don't? Reasonable doubt. That's how the system works.
Do you know something that the jurors don't? Reasonable doubt. That's how the system works.
This is weird question, because in OJ's case we know a lot of things that the jurors didn't. Part of the critique of the prosecutors in the case was that they decided not to enter a lot of material things into evidence (e.g. the entire Bronco chase).
Also, there are a lot of things that happened since then that the jurors did not know (because they didn't happen yet). He did write a book that was a description of himself committing the murders (but it is "hypothetical").