Most of Us Don’t Download Any Smartphone Apps at All
time.com
time.com
It is also a communicator device, but only in the sense that for some silly reason I can't place calls with the 2000$ box on my desk, but only with the 800$ one in my pocket.
None of the apps I have are perfect, especially now that we are in an awkward phase where we have an excellent Material spec and are very far from it in practice. However, they all do their job well enough. So well that I don't remember the last time I added an app to my routines.
Not to derail too much, 80-90% of my computer usage isn't even really possible with an iPhone or android, at least not productively. Small devices make it very hard for me to do anything other than small bite-sized interactions. When I'm writing music, prose, editing video, writing code, all of these things are borderline impossible on a phone, and barely possible on a tablet, and those things are the bulk of my computer usage.
Of course you can. Get a Softphone[1], a SIP account[2], and you're good to go.
[1] e.g. https://itunes.apple.com/en/app/telephone/id406825478?mt=12
[2] Here's a good list (calls to USA landline & mobile are free on most of them): http://www.mobilevoip.com/supported_brands
FXO card? :/
Misleading title.
I'm occasionally tempted to try building my own device, with a QWERTY keyboard, 320x240 monochrome LCD, and hardcoded apps for SMS and email. It would be big and clunky but it would be kind of nice to have a gadget that did exactly what I wanted.
I've learned that it helps to keep charging devices in one's carry-on bag.
Seems to me that in all of these cases, there is clear benefit to me and serves my needs as the end-user.
App permissions seem to be completely coarse-grained, and they all seem to need access to potentially huge amounts of personal data. I can't, so far as I know, disable their access to specific bits of data I don't want them to have; nor do I know of any mechanism for blacklisting or whitelisting access to specific internet hosts.
My Moto X decided a while back that it wanted to upgrade itself and started bringing up a nag screen at frequent intervals, interrupting whatever I was doing. There is no way I can discover to turn this off, and there is no way to decline the upgrade. It just kept nagging me, many times a day, for months. I can't disable this behavior; I can only choose between reduced functionality (getting interrupted mid-sentence and having to dismiss a dialog many times a day) or letting this remote server take over and install its software on my hardware.
In the end I feel like this device doesn't actually belong to me at all. It's more like a rental apartment: I can use it, and I can keep my stuff in it if I want to, but ultimately it belongs to the landlord; which in this case is a combination of Google, Motorola, and T-Mobile. The deal seems pretty clear: they get to decide what I am allowed to do with my phone, they get to decide where my information goes and who gets to see it, and I can either accept the deal or not use the phone. For the most part I have chosen the latter.
I think for most people, privacy is secondary to convenience and we basically sell data about ourselves in exchange for free use of these services that have become an essential part of our life.
I also think it's extremely hard to piece-meal control what permissions are allowed and requires substantially more work from app developers to consider all the possible conditional cases and have well thought out experiences when some/all pieces of data are missing. In many cases, it's just a matter of what is practical and doable in light of constrained resources. Not giving them a pass, but offering a possible reason instead of assuming malicious intent.
Presumably, the chief concerns are tracking and security. For instance, why does DropBox need to access my entire contact list just to backup my photos? Some people don't even think about it, others don't care but some do.
I think one of the challenges is that a lot of what an app maker wants to do is not known yet but they want to mine the user data to identify patterns that might help them decide on what features to build next or provide insight on how they should improve their app. Given this, they err on the side of asking for more data vs. less. On a mobile device, this definitely feels much more invasive given that our phones are basically "tied at the hip" when compared to classic web tracking techniques.
Knowing that "you" (your browser) looked at buying a car last week is far more valuable, especially when combined with other activity and demographic guesses. ie rather than a solid individual, your database records are a set of probabilities. Looked at diapers - probably have a kid. Looked at concert tickets for One Direction - you are likely young and very unlikely old. Combine all these anonymous snippets and probabilities and the database representation of you is then "exploited".
The goal is relevancy. Advertising pays on results, which means the advertisers don't want to pay for things going to people that aren't the targets. eg if they have a campaign aimed at females 20-30 years old that have children in North Texas, then they aren't going to pay for ads going to 60 year old men in Seattle. And if it is a car company, then ads going to people who are likely to buy a car in the near future is far more valuable than a kid playing Angry Birds. (There is also brand advertising where the idea is to keep a brand in your head and good feelings about it, but no immediate action expected of you. They find out if this works by doing it in some areas and not others, and then tracking sales etc over the longer term.)
In theory this should lead to you get good relevant to your interests advertising. In practise it is annoying drivel to many because the companies advertising (ie the ones paying) aren't relevant to you. They are trying to get your attention.
While I only mention advertising, the other pieces especially tracking are pretty much in support of the advertising. It allows the probabilistic deductions about you.
To avoid this you would need to eliminate Internet activity, or go completely anonymous (eg only using Tor, incognito browser sessions, and have components on your system constantly make up data like user agents and locations).
BTW you can see what Google has guessed about you at https://www.google.com/ads/preferences/ which works even if you aren't signed in.
The only reason she had one was a best buy employee convincing her as a replacement for her old but functional cell phone.
Edit: it's misleading because the article actually says 65% of smartphone users download zero apps in an average month. That doesn't mean most people never download apps. Just not every month.
The better criticism of this article, is that it's already well known that most smartphone users 1) don't download many apps and 2) don't use very many apps day to day.
Why is that? It's because most apps are not useful or valuable. If they were, people would use them.
The majority of people also do not visit a hundred Web sites each day. Rather, they stick to a very small number of sites, and tend to visit them frequently. No surprise app use is similar.
That is a very significant point.
I bought my wife a Google Play voucher at Christmas, and she was so overwhelmed by the mess that is the Play Store that it took her three months to find a decent solitaire app.
Everytime she would go looking for one she had to wade through pages of junk and just gave up.
Eventually I found one recommended on a forum and even then when we searched for the exact name in the Play Store it was only in the second row of results.
App discovery is HARD, particularly for people unfamiliar with app stores. I am not surprised that they just don't bother.
Thing is, the way I download stuff is I enter the play store and browse and download until I am done. This happens maybe twice a year. Maybe less frequently. The only other use case is when I feel the need for something (such as downloading a Flashlight app in the dark) or when I find out about the existence of a mobile version of something I already use.
If I were to download even 1 app per month, that would mean I'd be interested in casually browsing the Play store or that I am often trying new software such that some percent of it becomes important enough to me that I download the mobile app.
I'm not convinced that even 35% of people exhibit these behaviors.
Also the internet doesn't seem to like IE as much as the WebKit browsers, or at least that was the case before I gave up on WP8. And then there's the lack of a notification pane..
People are not building apps, but social graphs they could sell. Or addictions that they can milk. If the software happens to do something useful is a nice side effects.
On my android phone, I do install more things: netflix, kindle, audible, music player, weather app, and that is about it. Email and a web browser do it for me.
One of the principle uses of my i-Devices, it seems, has been the slow and steady accretion of apps from the store, which I end up completely ignoring. The description hooks me, or some friend recommends something they played with for 30 seconds and considered it worth twittering about, but generally .. my iDevices are a memory hole containing things I forget about, pretty much, straight away. This is a real conundrum for me - I hate it that I've gotten so much crud on my phone, and so the more I look at that crud, the more I choose to ignore it.
I blame this on the fact that my iDevices are phones, and I just didn't grow up with the idea of using the phone for anything except calling people, and maybe (barely) receiving messages with it (thats what a pager is for..) .. and also on the fact that the way that these apps is presented to me is just too darned un-organized. Apples' rigorous desire to dumb-the-device-down means I have no way of sorting the list of apps on my phone by "last-used-date", which alone would help me administer the device properly, or at least give me a means by which I could grasp the backlog of "opening a newly installed app for the first time".
The device also doesn't sort things automatically by category - I'm supposed to do this manually. That is such an infuriating conundrum in this, the 21st Century, that I simply refuse to participate in the stupidity. Its akin to the stupidity one finds, even still today, in something as mundane as the Finder of OSX which, for all the godlike computing power in the universe, still can't automatically update itself to fit its content, properly, in a sane and sensible manner. For all the intelligence and wow, Finder is still an utter piece of junk when it comes to sorting a list of files on the screen such that the labels of the columns describing each file auto-size to fit, nicely in a typographically pleasing fashion, the information in the window - Like what happens on Windows, which almost gets there, when you open an Explorer window on a folder and press ctrl-alt-numpad+ .. oh, how I wish this would JUST HAPPEN on any so-called Desktop operating system of the 21st Century, without me - the user - having to think about it..
So with regards to organizing the Apps on the iDevices, and interacting with the horrendously backlogged list of apps I've completely ignored over 8 years of iDevice ownership .. There seems to be some sort of glass ceiling about this, in my personal psychology, about how/what/when/why to use the phone for something. The most I ever dive into the 100's of un-used, generally useless apps I've accrued over time, is when I'm just sitting somewhere with nothing else better to do - and generally, that is a very rare occurrence these days.
There is one exception to this: my music-making iPad. This device gets used a lot for music-making, and there is a set of core apps I have gotten familiar with. But I don't treat that as an iDevice - for me now, its a well-maintained synthesizer device, which supplanted the previous studio-laptop-laden-with-endless-plugin-crud that I used to use. The fact is, I've only ever loaded up music-making apps on that device, when I'm in the mode of studio-usage, and that has been its only saving grace when it comes to App discovery. I wish I could do the same with the iPhone app collections, but there is just too much crud to deal with .. and the thing doesn't want to help me - at all, in the slightest - to deal with it.
There is likely a keyboard shortcut for it as well but I'm not sure of it.