A personal account of how call out culture has harmed teaching

trigger

noun - anything, as an act or event, that serves as a stimulus and initiates or precipitates a reaction or series of reactions.

verb (used with object) - to initiate or precipitate (a chain of events, scientific reaction, psychological process, etc.): Their small protest triggered a mass demonstration. to initiate or precipitate (a chain of events, scientific reaction, psychological process, etc.):

verb (used without object) - to become active; activate.

'Triggered' in this context is the past participle of the verb form used without an object.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/trigger?s=t

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participle

From what I've read, it is something similar to the "triggering" of a post traumatic panic attack. Akin to how veterans from war can be "triggered" by loud sounds or environments similar to what they experienced while at war, the term is used in the context of social triggering.

Basically, if you trigger someone, you're bringing up undue trauma for them, such as forcing them to reminisce about a prior rape or other similarly shocking event. I'll be the first to admit that I think the use of the term gets out of hand, as many people use it as an excuse to shut down discourse or browbeat opponents such that they do not say anything that could possibly agree with a reality that contains triggering or disagreeable thoughts.

In the context of the article, I imagine it's an attitude that's viewed as being used as a political tool against professors to stop them from teaching or using material that contains content outside of what the author prescribes as a "liberal agenda." I'll admit, I've seen similar problems with the undergrads at my own university (hell, I was an undergrad not too long ago and interacted with some of these people myself) , but I'm unsure if the problem is as tumorous as the author indicates.

I'd argue that for the most part, ideologies such as acceptance and "not consciously trying to distress or harm other people" are good ones. However, this appears to be the logical extreme of such ideas. Only Siths etc... The biggest problem with this though, is that if somebody _does_ make a claim against you for "triggering" or offending them, it is taken far more seriously than it often should. It appears people seem much more quick to jump to lawyers and litigation than I think was previous, but that is likely just a bias in what I see daily. At a systemic level, the best way to deal with such situations is to remove the mob mentality behind situations where discourse is shut down for the sake of political correctness (e.g. calling people out on social media), and to resolve the issue with some form of arbiter to ensure that neither side engages in petty tactics. The problem is that it is much, much easier said than done.

In this context, it means discussion that triggers an uncomfortable memory or thought by a sensitive person, perhaps directly related to the imagery, perhaps not. Either way, some liberals fault the speaker as victimizing the listener, whether intentional or not. Speakers should pre-censor their words.

Triggered means, made to recall and relive a traumatic psychological episode. Think about a soldier with PTSD hearing fireworks.

Now then, that's the impression of the mental anguish this word is supposed to evoke. However, in the context of this article, the phrase triggered is instead used anytime you're made uncomfortable.

Criticism of my writing? You triggered my feelings of inadequacy from my childhood... How dare you? Point out that I am using ad hominem arguments, and you're a privileged white male who is out to actively oppress me.

I wish this was one big circle jerk, full of self deprecating humor from a bored group of trolls, but it sure doesn't seem like it.

Search phrases for more research: "SJW", "cis", "/r/tumblerinaction"

As absurd as all of those generally are, I don't think any of those are remotely as absurd as retaliation against a teacher for teaching from a book that calls historical colonial slaughter "genocide".