Nice and simple, seems fast enough. I like that it's a responsive design.
I need an option for oldest first. (I can't use a feed reader without this option.)
Needs j/k for next/previous entry.
Top bar should scroll out of the way when reading entries so it doesn't take up so much space.
Default font should be something more readable than Helvetica/Arial. (My suggestion: Source Sans Pro.)
(Disclosures: I am a happy paid user of FeedHQ, but I like trying new feed readers.)
Now that I've tried it on my phone, I'd say the default font size is a too small. (I tried Firefox on Android.) On desktop, I can use browser page zoom, but on mobile I can't.
Non-Helvetica/Arial could be an option rather than default, for people who don't want to load an external font.
What do the rest of you think about the tipography? Too small, hard to read, good the way it is?
Helvetica/Arial is common enough, and sites like the BBC use it for body text, but there are so many free fonts available that are much readable for running text.
I'm getting 14 px text for article bodies. Usually something closer to 17 px is optimal, and I think zooming the page 120% looks best (14 px · 1.2 = 16.8 px).
In any case, your client does not say anything regarding the matter. My apologies in case this is something that can't be controlled.
EDIT: Another, small, thing: probably would be a better idea to make put the bar that, after registration, alerts to "check the email in order to verify the account" on top of the screen rather than on the bottom; or at least chat it's color to something more eyecatching. I don't know if it's only me, but I almost missed it.
What Feedbunch does, however, is limit how many entries it remembers for each feed. The current limit is 500 entries for a single feed; once a feed has more than 500 entries the oldest ones are removed until there are 500 left. The number (500) could be subject to change during the beta phase if users' feedback indicates it is too high or too low.
> The number (500) could be subject to change during the beta phase if users' feedback indicates it is too high or too low.
I don't think if this would be of any use for you but actually, there are websites that in a month produce way more than 500 entries. LifeHacker for example produces something from 730 to 800 entries per month (with very few of them being useful at all... and this is the reason why I decided to unsubscribe). So everything depends on how (and how much) a user checks the reader.