In your experience, which one is weighed more heavily?
Also, you give Harvard and Yale as examples of the "good name" schools and UC Berkeley and CMU as examples of "quality education" schools, but it's not that simple. In my experience, schools with smaller programs tend to offer far better educational experiences than schools with very large programs. In this sense, Harvard is more likely to give you a better undergraduate education that UC Berkeley, where huge class sizes make for a very different classroom experience, and you will find it more difficult to get to know your professors than at a smaller school. If I were choosing, I would look for a school that had a good name, modest CS class sizes, high quality peers, and where undergraduates had many opportunities to work closely with faculty. The class size and faculty interaction is where schools like UC Berkeley lose out.
- MIT
- Harvard, Princeton, Stanford
- CMU
- UC Berkeley, Yale, Caltech
- UIUC, rest of Ivy leagues
Several state schools also have fantastic computer science programs. These are: University of Washington, UT Austin, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and Georgia Tech. Glancing at the U.S. News CS rankings, it looks like Wisconsin, UCLA, Michigan, UCSD, and Maryland are also up there.
Some of the Ivy League schools also have very good computer science departments: Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Penn, Brown, Cornell. Don't go to Yale for CS. Not sure about Dartmouth.
Caltech is also obviously really good.
If you want to do programming post-graduation, you'd be fine going to any of the schools I listed above. Google, Facebook, etc. recruit from all of them, and I'm sure they'd look good on a resume for a startup. If you go to a school not listed above, you'd probably have a little bit more difficulty getting an interview (though this would get to be less of a problem with time, after you have actual work experience).
If you want to go to graduate school for computer science, make sure you go somewhere where there are lots of good researchers so that you can get involved with research as an undergrad (any of the schools above would do).
Here's where it gets tricky. All of the schools I listed above have prestige in the CS world. However, in the general business world (i.e. not tech companies), and in finance, it's Ivy League schools that have prestige. So, if you want to go into traditional finance or management consulting, you'd be better off going to Yale than Carnegie Mellon. This is what people are talking about when they say that the "name" matters.
TLDR; if you're sure you want to do programming, go to a top CS school (public or private). If you think you might want to do finance or consulting instead, go to an Ivy.
(Source: I'm a CS student at Princeton.)
Also: admissions at Ivies and Stanford work very differently from admissions at MIT, CMU, and Berkeley. The latter set of schools are more meritocratic -- you get in if you have high grades, high test scores, etc. (Although it takes a lot more than high grades and test scores to get into MIT.) The Ivies care a lot about extracurriculars, athletics, and essays. So, if you're, like, a world champion debater, that would go far at Harvard, but not so much at MIT.
In fact, I'd go so far in saying that meeting people outside of your typified social circle isn't institution dependent, rather an individual preference (so I wouldn't be surprised if your generalization isn't applicable to MIT either).
That said, CMU, Cal and a handful of other schools with noted CS programs are bigger names in the west coast tech world than most of the Ivy League.
Source: Six years working at different jobs with people from the same seven schools.
UCLA, USC, and UC San Diego all make the list, but those are to some extent peculiar to my experiences in California. The last few are probably a different grab bag depending where in the country you want to end up.
I can't speak properly to how things are done abroad, but my understanding from other fields is that name recognition matters even more.
Undergrad from HYP can open doors in fields you may like: IB, PE, HF, Consulting, etc, in the case you lose interest in being a programmer. You can become a programmer even after an HYP education.
Decide where you want to live. Manhattan, NY is very.different from Manhattan, KS...so to speak. People who are well suited for one are not for the other.
Second piece of advice that's becoming one of my standards;
Decide if you will be happier as a big fish in a little pond or a little fish in a big pond. Being below average at MIT is way above average on an absolute scale but for some people it will be utterly miserable to the point they won't thrive.
The big name schools May open doors when you graduate, but in the long run its about what you can do.
Good luck.
Source: I've witnessed graduate admissions committees at a top school at work.
Make the most of your opportunities. Plenty of people I know from NCSU went to grad school at top institutions or to work at Google, MSFT, etc
Its a great school for ECE, but I'm not convinced anymore that its as good for CS. We have a lot of very smart people but..I don't see a lot of innovation coming from here. This might be the case at most CS schools in general, but its disheartening when I read about the opportunities and developments at MIT/Stanford/CMU on a daily basis.
I actually graduated from UC Santa Cruz; in my actual experience, the classes at UCSC did me quite a lot more good in my career than the ones I took at Caltech. However my degree was in Physics, but the classes that really made a difference to me were psychology, social psychology and anthropology.
In the work world, you see, it helps a great deal to understand other people.