Obama's view on schools
latimes.com
latimes.com
http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/39809 mentions the interesting example of a teacher who teaches Russian immigrants. No matter how well she teaches, she's got the huge disadvantage that her students start with no proficiency in English and so are guaranteed to do well. Pay for performance rules are a strong disincentive for taking on tough challenges like that.
Still the current system is so horribly broken that I am personally willing to put up with breakage like that.
In other words, real world training.
I suppose in most cases those rules are consequences of contract provisions insisted upon by teacher union representatives.
http://www.amazon.com/Teacher-Unions-Sabotage-Educational-Re...
I guess each school would get a performance index that would act as a coefficient for the teachers there. E.g., the metric is a test score, and one school consistently scores near the national average, while another is 10 points lower. The teachers at the lower school would have their evaluation bumped 10 points because of the index. That way we'd be comparing apples to applies.
It could actually incentivize teachers to move into more difficult schools if the index were a little over done so that they were rewarded slightly more for the same effort. Their effort would theoretically move the school's average into line with the national average, then they'd be evaluated/paid the same -- they could then move on to the next problem school, and improve that.
In fact it makes me wonder how he motivated her to improve her grade to 95%....
Agreed though, I would like to know...
We need a culture of intrinsic ambition and excellence - among students, among teachers, and among professionals. Focusing on fake heuristics - grades, standardized tests, gold stars - only teaches one to cheat, not to personally excel.