>How is 7% close to a rounding error?
I didn't say 7% was a rounding error. I wrote "a quarter" of 7%, which is rather different.
I didn't say 7% was a rounding error. I wrote "a quarter" of 7%, which is rather different.
But if commercial landscaping isn't included in that 7%, this number becomes larger. And if the drought is very serious, why wouldn't it be theoretically possible to cut landscaping usage down to near 0%? A 25% reduction seems like it would be very easy. (Although, I admit I don't have any idea what the breakdown of landscaping water usage looks like.)