arq (which we love) + rsync.net = success.
We have a "HN readers" discount which is fairly substantial.
We have a "HN readers" discount which is fairly substantial.
rsync.net is 20x more expensive than Google Nearline ($0.20/GB).
Why would anyone choose to use it for Arq when Arq supports both?
rsync.net just saying: "Hey, we're not Google or Amazon" is already a big selling point for some.
Further, Amazon S3 is a better comparison, as far as pricing goes - we're fully live, online, random access storage - not nearline or weirdline like google/glacier.