WorkLife (YC W15) launches to end bad meetings
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
I have two hopefully constructive and slightly meta suggestions:
1. Your tour page could benefit from some TLC. I looked at it on a large monitor, and it was so spaced out and the text so large and poorly rendered that it was actively unpleasant to read through. I’m happy to give more specific feedback if it would be useful. (I’ve just realised that despite being interested in your project and having reached the end of that page, in the time it took to write this comment I have already forgotten almost everything it said except for a couple of features I guessed would be there anyway.)
2. You’re writing a tool where business people are presumably going to discuss work, potentially including all kinds of sensitive information about current status and future plans. I lost track of how many deal-breakers your current privacy policy contains in that context, but it was lots.
Good luck to Dave and the team. Let me know if I can help with guest blogs etc.
[1] http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/managing/supercharge-yo...
Two questions for the founder:
- How much of this is process vs the tool itself? (How much is this an improvement over Shared Google docs?)
- The company name isn't MeetingLife. What's next on the agenda?
- There's plenty to do to fix meetings (and doing so will help improve people's work life), so that will be our focus for the foreseeable future. Funny enough, we did change the name from MeetingHero, we felt WorkLife was more in line with our fundamental purpose and long term aspiration.
What's the big benefit above and beyond using Google Docs?
Again, I'm a big fan of the concept, as fixing Poorly Run Meetings is a solvable problem.
Also the meeting summary was never generated. At least I thought it would be.
Hope this helps